- A computer for testing and optimising the robot (Expert Advisor).
- Hardware for strategy tester? internal memory, cpu, gpu needed?
- What PC hardware is good for fast backtest for MT5?
What parameters should be paid attention to when building a new computer for the fast operation of the optimizer in mt5? (CPU, video card, memory). In general, I need to build a machine for fast maths processing and high speed operation of my robot (when working on history).
What parameters should I pay attention to when building a new computer for the quick performance of the optimizer in mt5 ? (CPU, video card, memory). In general, I need to build a machine for fast maths processing and high speed of the robot (when working on the history).
Number of cores for test agents + frequency - the more the better
16GB of memory or more
Card is only important for using OpenCL
I am waiting for Ryzen, it will be out on March 2nd and there will be a bunch of tests on the web
Only a server farm can significantly increase the speed of testing. You could get some i7 laptops, they are not as noisy as desktops and take up little space, thankfully vendors are stagnant and there are discounts everywhere.
It would be cheaper in the cloud
What parameters do I need to pay attention to when building a new computer for the fast operation of the optimizer in MT5? (CPU, video card, memory). In general, I need to build a machine for fast maths processing and high speed of the robot (when working on the history).
None.
If the terminal is installed, the computer is suitable for "fast operation of the optimizer in MT5".
I will not bother using cloud. Alexei is right.
If you run every change in the algorithm through the debugging process, it can get more expensive.
You could foolishly break something. So let's run it without changes - just "to make sure".
I am surprised how irrationally many local participants use optimization. Starting from "optimization on real ticks" where even OHLC on minutes is too greasy, and ending with a total overshoot of parameters where most of them can be cut off, and using genetics.
It seems to me that some people still look at the Expert Advisors as some kind of "black boxes with the RUNNING BABLO button", rather than as tools which perform TS, and expect that a more thorough optimization "on ticks" and "with full brute force" will bring them the long-awaited cornucopia.
You could foolishly break something. So let's run it without changes - just "to make sure".
I am surprised how irrationally many local participants use optimization. From "optimization on real ticks" where even OHLC on minutes is too greasy, to total overshooting of parameters where most of them can be cut off, and using genetics.
It seems to me that some people still look at EAs as some kind of "black boxes with a RUNNING BABLO button", rather than as tools which perform TS, and expect that more thorough optimization "on ticks", and "with full brute force" will bring them the long-awaited cornucopia.
Possibly, but it depends on the way you work. If you run every change in the algorithm during debugging, it may be more expensive.
Wondering what developers offer for optimisation.
Do their methods cope with gully functions?

- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
You agree to website policy and terms of use