Recipes for increasing revenue from the sale of Signals - page 7
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
He was recently banned, which probably makes you wonder a bit, even without statistics. And monstrous slippage and obscenely large deposit, too. Well, those who have nevertheless logged in, are their own enemies, then ))))
New data:
Subscriber funds - cumulative funds of only real accounts within the risks used. So, we see that Signals handles an amount of $5.5M. Whether this is a lot or a little, I don't know. We have to compare it with competitors, but it would not be correct to do so here. I think that the amount is exaggerated in fact, because developers do not yet know how to clearly separate flies from cutlets (real and demo). So that some kind of demo-funks are definitely accounted for there. But the order, I think, is clear.
Distribution of subscribers' funds on broker-source locations is as follows (broker - funds):
Results below $50K have not been inserted.
I am not so good at visualization. Maybe, I should just write general CSV-file and put it here. Who understands Excel and wants to visualize - write how to do it, I will do it.
And finally, top ranking by subscribers (see Funds):
Top ranking of signals with the thickest (on average) subscribers (see per one ):
I've drawn these conclusions myself so far:
In general, the impression is that the signal owners use the service for a short-term scam.
One use case:
Neither good managers want to work for a fixed percentage, not a fixed subscription fee.
Neither are there any good managers. That's sad.
The service is indeed used by part of the suppliers to defraud. But there are also normal managers.
There is some strategic error in this service. They saw a successful scheme, a pamm scheme, and are trying to copy it one-to-one. No, on the one hand it is certainly true that many cloners are more successful than the original, but why do not you see the unique features and capabilities of the service? The opportunities for development here are gigantic, but the meta-quotes don't catch mice, at all. Damn, such business development opportunities are lost :)
After sorting by length of trade I found almost an HFT-nik... While I'm banned, there's no history to see.
What a high-frequency trader, 19 trades in 5 months, and both signals are repeated...
And he also likes to make deposits without warning, which is not good for the client, as his account is not automatically replenished.
But there are some unlucky ones out there. This guy, for example, fits many of the conclusions, but no subscribers so far. What could be the reason for that, I don't understand.
He is still ahead of the curve, he has been trading for only three weeks but he already has two new trades and will have more if he survives. It's bad that he closes his deals late and doesn't take all he could.