For those who like to measure... achievements))) - page 36

 
STARIJ:

Need mq4 ? trade for any really consistently profitable EA

if that's what i described, then i don't need
 
Renat Akhtyamov: If that's what I described, I don't need

Where and what did you describe? There is no access to and analysis of history in the EA. Is that what you are afraid of? Or is something described before? Sorry, I was too lazy to read. Tell me in a nutshell. As a programmer, I understand, as they say, from the word go

 
STARIJ:

where and what has been described? There is no access to and analysis of history in the EA. Is that what you are afraid of? Or has something been described before? Sorry, I was too lazy to read. Tell me in a nutshell. As a programmer - I understand, as they say, from the word go

I'm not afraid, but that's the strategy I had in mind.
 
STARIJ:

Where and what did you describe? There is no access to and analysis of history in the EA. Is that what you are afraid of? Or is something described before? Sorry, I was too lazy to read. Tell me in a nutshell. As a programmer - I understand, as they say, from the word go


Well, in a nutshell.

 
Alekseu Fedotov: Well, in a nutshell

If you put 0 spread, then any reversal martin fixing profit on every tick will show this result, algorithm below.
The strategy behaviour can often be understood by equity, that is why only equity reports are posted here, not a screenshot from the tester :)

1. open a random trade, you can use an indicator to reduce the drawdown
2. if the loss is -0.00001, then close the trade, roll over with a double lot
3. close the deal at +0.00001
4. if you want to avoid showing drawdowns in МТ Report, then do not close loss-making trades, but cover them with a bigger volume, and close them with the total profit
5. in the tester, it always works because price is guaranteed to pass 0.00001, so the profit will be on every bar, or rather forex, on the stock exchange dead mini-bars the size of one tick
6. To make it closer to real life, simply introduce a spread or commission, then you won't even trade at 0, because then you need to predict the price behaviour on the spread, say 0.00030, and the mathematical expectation is flying below the Mariana Trench

I saw once at one Robo pair the Bid was bigger than Ask immediately at trade opening, i.e., I opened - closed and I got everything good, I even did not need to wait till the price passed 0.00001, however, the next day the bug was fixed :)

 
Initial deposit3.00

Spread2
Net profit22113531.75Total profit22113531.75Total loss-0.00
Profitability
Expected payoff69979.53

Absolute drawdown0.22Maximum drawdown100600.00 (0.62%)Relative drawdown60.75% (2030.68)

Total trades316Short positions (% win)158 (100.00%)Long positions (% win)158 (100.00%)

There is a completely different strategy

Download and test it. But specifically limited to EURUSD and only 2017 and early 2018
 
 
A1. Best ever Strategy Tester during last 17 years (EURUSD M30).
https://www.mql5.com/en/code/166

1. https://www.mql5.com/en/code/17428 M1 timeframe.

Let's consider backtesting of the Expert Advisor on historical data (EURUSD H1, testing period: 2010.01.01-2011.02.02, PeriodK=9, PeriodD=5, PeriodSlow=20, MA_period=27).
https://www.mql5.com/en/code/297

3. https://www.mql5.com/en/code/17992 -- tested from 100 *good*

4. Let's consider backtesting of the Expert Advisor on historical data (EURUSD H1, testing period: 2000.01.01-2011.03.16, PeriodK=12, PeriodD=8, PeriodSlow=29, MA_period=4).
In creation of Expert Advisor we used the fixed volume (Trading Fixed Lot, 0.1), Trailing Stop algorithm is not used (Trailing not used).
https://www.mql5.com/en/code/301

5. Try Last https://www.mql5.com/en/code/19525

6. Let's consider backtesting of the Expert Advisor on historical data (EURUSD H1, testing period: 2010.01.01-2011.03.16, PeriodMFI=37, MA_period=13).
In creation of Expert Advisor we used the fixed volume (Trading Fixed Lot, 0.1), Trailing Stop algorithm is not used (Trailing not used).
https://www.mql5.com/en/code/287

7. MEDIAM
MQL5 Wizard - Trade Signals Based on Price Crossover with Moving Average, confirmed by ADX - expert for MetaTrader 5
Let's consider backtesting of the Expert Advisor on historical data (EURUSD H1, testing period: 1.1.2010-05.01.2011, PeriodADX=33, MinimumADX=22, PeriodMA=39, StopLoss=400, TakeProfit=900).
In creation of Expert Advisor we used the fixed volume (Trading Fixed Lot, 0.1), Trailing Stop algorithm is not used (Trailing not used).
https://www.mql5.com/en/code/258

8. https://www.mql5.com/en/code/1424
9. https://www.mql5.com/en/code/307
10. The image shows learning results of work of the Expert Advisor on EURUSD M15 with default settings.
https://www.mql5.com/en/code/1108.

11. Martigible EA
https://www.mql5.com/en/code/16898

12. https://www.mql5.com/en/code/18314

13. https://www.mql5.com/en/code/15262

14. High Risk
https://www.mql5.com/en/code/158

15. Martigible EA can be true or false but good logic
https://www.mql5.com/en/code/155

 
esmaster:

Thinking like this, let's take a MA with a period of 1 on the closing price and it will show us the closing price of the day? But then it should be like this on the real as well... Let's rejoice and get rich!!! Or is it different in real life, and the tester is stupid?
There is a small error in your reasoning - at any time and for any period Close[0] = Bid

void OnStart()
{
   Alert(iMA(NULL, PERIOD_M1, 1, 0, MODE_SMA,PRICE_CLOSE,0),
   "   ",iMA(NULL, PERIOD_H1, 1, 0, MODE_SMA,PRICE_CLOSE,0),
   "   ",iMA(NULL, PERIOD_D1, 1, 0, MODE_SMA,PRICE_CLOSE,0),
   "   ", Bid );

   Alert("   M1            H1            D1          Bid");
}
The site engine has been updated - some of the messages are lost
 
STARIJ:

Thinking like this, let's take a MA with a period of 1 on the closing price and it will show us the closing price of the day? But then it should be like this on the real as well... Let's rejoice and get rich!!! Or is it different in real life, and the tester is stupid?
There is a small error in your reasoning - at any time and for any period Close[0] = Bid

The site engine has been updated - some of the messages are lost
No he's not.
Reason: