neural network and inputs - page 3
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Bullshit.
Correlation is a pattern.
This is not nonsense, it is a typical mistake, and the proof is one and very clear - at 100% correlation there is no point in searching for a pattern, because one tool becomes exactly another tool. Why use this, the other tool, if it is the same?
In case you perceive the correlation as a tool, then there is another counter-argument - why correlate throughout, if it is enough to correlate only at certain points, where the inputs should be? And even in this case, the correlation will also take a minimum value....)))
This is not nonsense, it is a typical mistake, and the proof is one and very clear - at 100% correlation there is no point in searching for a pattern, because one tool becomes exactly another tool. Why use this, the other tool, if it is the same?
In the case of your perception of correlation as a tool, then there is a counter-argument - why correlate throughout, if correlation only at certain points where there should be inputs is sufficient? And even in this case, the correlation will also take a minimum value....)))
There is no mistake here - there is no 100% correlation in forex.
High correlation - divergence - opening a position, etc. Then the correlation coefficient went down and the TS died.
And sometimes in financial markets the correlation coefficient has changed sign
All this has been known for a long time.
It wasn't about the euro-dollar-index....))))
And by the way, at that time, I checked, for the sake of interest, the correlation between euro-dollar and euro-yen was minimal, as it will be no surprise to you. You can check it all yourself - the data is all there ))))
There is no mistake - there is no 100% correlation in forex.
Well fuck it, the closer you get to 100%, the bigger the error and the missing the point of searching for patterns..... How's that? ))))
It wasn't about the euro-dollar-index....))))
And by the way, at the time, I checked, for the sake of interest, the correlation between the euro-dollar and the euro-yen was minimal, as will not be surprising to you. Yes you can check it all yourself - the data is all there ))))
Show me the result.
The correlation coefficient EUR USD and EURJPY was "minimal"? How much is that? I can still understand EURUSD and JPYUSD, but this................
No, it didn't. Divergence is not a pattern on which you can make money.
Show me the result.
The EURUSD and EURJPY correlation coefficient was "minimal"??? How much is that? I can still understand EURUSD and JPYUSD, but this................
In my memory, if I'm not mistaken, 0.3-0.4. So you can check it yourself - you can download the whole story and calculate.....)))
No, it isn't. Divergence is not a pattern on which you can make money.
Yeah sure it is! Pair trading to the scrapheap etc. etc.
You, of course, know better. (that's sarcasm)
In my memory, if I'm not mistaken, 0.3-0.4. So you can check it yourself - you can download the whole story and count it.....)))
The EURUSD and EURJPY correlation coefficient was "minimal"??? How much is it? I can still understand EURUSD and JPYUSD, but this................