You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
People usually come to NS from frustration with technical analysis, on the one hand, and on the other hand, in an attempt to get, in fact, an indicator that no one else has. But all these people do not understand that the problem is in the non-stationarity of the market (variable mo and dispersion), and not in the absence of a miracle indicator, and if TS does not take into account this nuance, then any system, with or without NS, tends to rot and necessarily lose deposits. Therefore success on NS is possible just like success on TA. But TA is preferable because TA algorithms are much simpler, their internal structure is clearer and works much faster, different adaptation variants are possible. But still win on TA or NS - it is a win for an experienced player in the casino, no more.
PS. Many times wrote about it on this forum, just alsu confirmed my suspicions about the NS.
PS. Have written about it many times on this forum, just alsu confirmed my suspicions about NS.
And for the second time I ask - where do the nets work in the present tense ?
Everywhere )
I haven't tried it, but I suspect... Go clown around in the smoking room.
Everywhere )
Actually, I can tell you to fuck off.
I ask for specifics. It's usually expressed in graphs and numbers, not for clowns.
I know exactly (with a sigh), it was a hint. Applied understanding of the issue, in my opinion, makes it easier to understand. Or he who thinks clearly - he who speaks clearly.... Otherwise they will talk about non-stationarity for another 5 years .... )))
Not 5, but 55 and all about non-stationarity.
Please be specific. It is usually expressed in graphs and figures, this I explain not for clowns.
Yes, I will. After your answers to my questions to you. To a bunch of ignored questions. If you answer, you get specific. No -- suck it.
It's not for me. It's for yourself, as any words without figures, links, graphs are just flubber. Learn to justify without getting personal.
I do not need anything from you: I am able to program, but otherwise I can not remember anything worthy of you - only the show-offs.
And the topicstarter will be interested, he puts the question specifically - where?
Not 5, but 55 and all about unsteadiness.
And so the third time ... Are we going to move on to torture, or should we remember where the nets work nowadays?
What about me? My TV remote control works - it executes my commands.
It's up toTheXpert .He has "everywhere" and I have "nowhere" and am convinced that it cannot. I've stated the reason.
LetTheXpert post the result at least once. You can post someone else's, but convincing.
What about me? My TV remote control works - it executes my commands.
It's up toTheXpert .He has "everywhere" and I have "nowhere" and am convinced that it cannot. I've stated the reason.
Let him post the result at least once. It can be someone else's, but convincing.