Econometrics: let's discuss the CU balance sheet. - page 18
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
This is how the structure of the universe was imagined in the Middle Ages.
.
At the insistence of the Church and the scholastics, observations of nature were replaced by the study of Aristotle's works. The following case is typical: a monk, having seen sunspots through a telescope, decided to show them to his ecclesiastical superior. But he refused to look, saying: "In vain, my son, I have read Aristotle's works from the beginning to the end many times and I can assure you that I have not found anything like that in him anywhere. Go and take it easy. Be assured that what you mistake for sunspots is only a defect in your glasses, or your eyes."
Thus, in isolation from life, from nature, was the study of the world around us in the Middle Ages.
.
Ring any bells? In modern parlance, with "nobels" .....
I have given advice many times, from the heart. Look at the state-space models - I think they're all derived from TAU, but stripped down.
For the rest, just don't bother - ridiculous.
I've given you a lot of advice from the heart. Look at the state-space models - I think they're all derived from TAU, but stripped down.
For the rest, just stay out of it - ridiculous.
you're so impenetrable....
Some of my classmates have gone into automated management and I with the other part into automated management. The words are very similar and the base is the same, but there is nothing in common. We all realised this about 5 years after graduation. Why should I remember (and in fact master) methods of automatic control, if not all automated methods fit in my head? Why experiment with income? I don't need that. There is a huge set of tried and tested tools and methods with which to make money. Right now hundreds of people from the site are mastering R. A year from now, another site will be qualitatively different, but without TAU. TAU will never be here. So "wow you're impenetrable....".
Some of my classmates have gone into automated management and I with the other part into automated management. The words are very similar and the base is the same and there is nothing in common. We all understood this about 5 years after graduating from the institute. Why should I remember (and in fact master) methods of automatic control, if not all automated methods fit in my head? Why experiment with income? I don't need that. There is a huge set of tried and tested tools and methods with which to make money. Right now hundreds of people from the site are mastering R. A year from now, another site will be qualitatively different, but without TAU. TAU will never be here. So "wow you're impenetrable....".
I have not said a word about TAU here in this thread. I was speaking exclusively in the language of statistics. But your objections are based on the "you're a fool" formula. Do you think that's the correct scientific method?
;))))
I have not said a word about TAU here in this thread. I was speaking exclusively in the language of statistics. But your objections are based on the "you're a fool" formula. Do you think that's the correct scientific method?
;))))
Go read Aristotle, though. It's more useful than arguing with Faa anyway. He knows better anyway. ;)
// Just kidding, if anything.
I have not said a word about TAU here in this thread. I was speaking exclusively in the language of statistics. But your objections are based on the "you're a fool" formula. Do you think that's the correct scientific method?
;))))
Oh, come on. There are plenty of my posts with calculations. And the fact that you were arguing in the language of statistics, that's just what you think. Cauchy alone on kotirs.....
Go and read Aristotle, though. It's more useful than arguing with Faa anyway. He knows better anyway. ;)
// Just kidding.
Aristotle is my friend, but Nobel is more valuable.
Oh, come on. My posts are full of my calculations. And the fact that you were arguing in the language of statistics, that's just what you think. Coshi alone is worth it on quotes.....
So, quotes and Cauchy are incompatible?
;)))))))))))
So? Cotier and Koshi aren't related anymore? What book does it say that?
I'm not going to say, as I'm not interested. Just off the top of my head: kotir has mo and dispersion, while Koshi does not. Although this may not be an argument, especially at the breakpoints of kotir.
Once again. Not interested.