"Reliable and constant forex profits"- That's what the authors of the system claim.

New comment
 
Here you will be presented with a trading system with reliable and constant profit.
Although the system is 100% reliable, we do not use it personally and we only give you the proof,
As proof that it is possible to have a constant profit on the Forex market.
Naturally, you can use it.
In fact, the yield is in the range of 30% per annum.
It is a good and reliable rate, but we think that it is small compared to the labor costs.
Perhaps you can improve it.
Why not.

We tell you right away that we will not touch the subject of swaps and commissions.
If someone says that a negative swap and commission will "eat up" all the profits, we will answer.
We answer, there are "Islamic accounts" where swap is not charged and the swap may be positive.
The result of commission and swap can be reduced to zero by netting between them.
You just need to select the right brokerage company.
The search for such a brokerage company is also a drawback of this system.
In this case the principle-"engine" of the system is interesting.

Trading system.

1.Open two accounts, one in euros, the other in dollars.
2) In the euro account we set EUR growth, or USD growth.
3.The leverage is such that when the price leaves by 2000 points, our deposit is either lost or doubled.
For example, if the deposit is 1000 bahts, the leverage will be 1/5.
4) Let's assume that this has happened six months later - the price has gone up by 2000 points.
For example the dollar rose (it does not matter).
5) We obtain a deposit flowing from one depot to another (on one 0 euros, on another 2000 $).
With what then we gain.
6.Profit 15% for six months (30% per annum), we receive on the fact,
dollar rose by 2000 points in six months, which is 15%.
If the euro rose, we would also be in the black.

In short, this is an investment. We have invested money in the currency, which is sure to grow.
That's all. Profits are small, but reliable.
Of course, it's an old and antediluvian system.
But the main thing is that there is a positive mathematical expectation in the Forex market.
 
great! super! super-duper! so 50% of the original investment doesn't count?
 
On one account, there will be a doubling plus an increase relative to the other currency. The whole question is what will happen to the rouble against the surviving currency at that time.
 
4x-online:
On one account, there will be a doubling plus an increase relative to the other currency. The whole question is what will happen to the rouble against the surviving currency at that time.
And what does Putin say will happen to the rouble?
 
paukas:
What does Putin say will happen to the ruble?
shh-shh-shh! not yet, he will say it on 5 March.
 
moskitman:
shh-shh-shh! he's not talking yet, he will on 5 March.
Well now there is nothing to be afraid of. Now he knows how to increase GDP by 30% a year through the system.
 
paukas:
There is nothing to be afraid of now. Now he knows how to increase GDP by 30% a year through the system.
When he first started, he promised to double GDP (he must have read "strategists" from forex).
 
911: We get our $2,000 back anyway, minus the spread.

What does this have to do with 15%?

Spreads and commissions do not count, that's what the topicstarter's first post said: "You just have to choose the right brokerage company.

15% semi-annual is if:

  1. the Eurobucks manages to move at least 2,000 points in six months,
  2. those 2,000 points would be at least 15% of the original exchange rate,
  3. the exchange rate of the rouble against the currency of that account, which will double, will fall by at least the amount of real domestic inflation over those six months.

If you do not believe me check it. I was just doing my calculations today and saw this thread later.

 

:-) First, with THIS small (maybe not - maybe even 1:500) leverage will take out one trading account on stop - out, the one which will be against the trend (if it is present), and then the second - on the rollback of the main movement of the instrument... If there's no significant movement of the pair - it will bump at best at b/w level and that's it...

"The thing is that its yield fluctuates around 30% per annum.
This is a good and reliable interest, but we think it's small compared to the labour costs." - what are these "labour costs"? :-)

 
Roman.:

:-) First, with THIS small (maybe not - maybe even 1:500) leverage will take out one trading account by stop-out, the one which will be against the trend (if it exists), and then the second - on a rollback from the main movement of the instrument...

For this case there is SL and TP, it is quite possible to calculate

 
BoraBo:

There is an SL and TP for this case, it is quite possible to calculate


:-) No. Because after a moose action on one account, a moose will also be worked on the other account with obligatory (as a rule it happens) pair reversal after the first moose action... I suggest to improve the system, by means of martin (lots and etc) on these accounts...

1234567891011
New comment