[Archive] Learn how to make money villagers! - page 131

New comment
 
vladds:
here's a sequence for you!


What are the considerations, IMHO:

1. Too much fiddling with market entry signals makes no sense... The same MA etc... - I.e. the price can quickly and without a hitch go to the abyss regardless of the signals. It will result in suspended buy and negative equity. If I wanted to check whether there was an owl with the same criterion, then - 2. Limit my work by time, let's say Eurobucks trades only during Asian and European sessions, after that - cover all positions and not trade until opening Asia ... Although a reverse trend may be launched during Asia, but with a much smaller probability ... In any case, this owl needs to be controlled by the MANAGER...:-) At least in part of its on/off on the news, time limit its work perhaps in the code... something like this... for starters...:-)

 
Roman.:


Any thoughts, IMHO:

1. Too much fiddling with market entry signals makes no sense... The same MAs, etc... - i.e. the price can quickly and without a hitch go to the abyss regardless of the signals. It will result in suspended buy and minus equity, therefore, of course, only a basic TA for entering the market is needed. If I wanted to check whether there was an owl with the same criterion, then - 2. Limit my work by time, let's say Eurobucks trades only during Asian and European sessions, after that - cover all positions and not trade until opening Asia ... Although a reverse trend may be launched during Asia, but with a much smaller probability ... In any case, this owl needs to be controlled by the MANAGER...:-) At least in part of its on/off on the news, time limit its work perhaps in the code... something like this... for a start...:-)


i do not know in general but i know one thing for sure i come out in the plus more often than in the minus and this is already progress on the other hand trade at least a month and we will see everything in reality
 
Roman.:

Vadim, you're looking at the wrong owl... Look at this one - DoubleMinus_1.mq4 - download it from the first page of the branch.
So, this is it. Without any changes in parameters.
 

This is in the tester for last Friday.

I'm surprised I didn't lose it! A profit of 2.48%! Not bad.

There are 2441 bars in the history.
3880 ticks simulated
Modeling quality n/a
Error of chart mismatch 0
Initial deposit 300.00
Net profit 7.46
Total profit 275.09
Total loss -267.63
Profitability 1.03
Expected payoff 0.01
Absolute drawdown 117.71
Maximum drawdown 117.71 (39.24%)
Relative drawdown 39.24% (117.71)
Total trades 536
Short positions (% win) 273 (46.52%)
Long positions (% win) 263 (46.39%)
Profitable trades (% of all) 249 (46.46%)
Loss trades (% of all) 287 (53.54%)
Largest
profitable trade 8.82
Deal Deal with loss -5.20
Average
1.10 Profit deal
Loss trade -0.93
Maximum number
Continuous wins (profit) 10 (31.80)
Continuous Losses (Loss) 18 (-21.67)
Max.
Continuous Profit (number of wins) 37.24 (9)
Continuous loss (number of losses) -35.36 (11)
Average
continuous winnings 4
Continuous loss 4

 
Zhunko:
So this is it. Without changing the parameters.


Your take-off angle is kind of steep...:-)

It's a MUCH steeper, at least a 45° angle - at the five digits... try these parameters...

extern double LotExponent=1.1;   // ?? ??????? ???????? ??? ??? ??????????? ?????????? ??????. ??????: ?????? ??? 0.1, ?????: 0.16, 0.26, 0.43 ...
extern double slip = 30.0;           // ?? ??????? ????? ?????????? ???? ? ?????? ???? ?? ???????? ??????? (? ????????? ?????? ??????? ???????? ????)
extern double Lots = 0.01;          // ????? ???? ??? ?????? ??????
extern int lotdecimal = 2;          // ??????? ?????? ????? ??????? ? ???? ???????????? 0 - ?????????? ???? (1), 1 - ???????? (0.1), 2 - ????? (0.01)
extern double TakeProfit=50;    // ?? ?????????? ???????? ??????? ??????? ????????? ??????
extern double Pipstep=20.0;      // ??? ????? ??????????? ????? ?????
 
Roman.:


Your take-off angle is a bit steep...:-)

Everything is MUCH steeper there, at least at a 45° angle - on a five-digit... try these parameters...

I haven't made a single deal with these parameters in 2 years.
 

Vadim, and everyone else, change your approach to logic! Your losses are not limited, but your profits are. With such an approach, nothing will work.

If you cut profits, cut losses too. The question is how? I manage to do it with the ratio of lots to profits/losses. But there are plenty of other ways...

 
Zhunko:

This is in the tester for last Friday.

I'm surprised I didn't lose it! A profit of 2.48%! That's not bad.

Bars in the history 2441
Modelled ticks 3880
Modeling quality n/a
Chart mismatch errors 0
Initial deposit 300.00
Net profit 7.46
Total profit 275.09
Total loss -267.63
Profitability 1.03
Expected payoff 0.01
Absolute drawdown 117.71
Maximum drawdown 117.71 (39.24%)
Relative drawdown 39.24% (117.71)
Total trades 536
Short positions (% win) 273 (46.52%)
Long positions (% win) 263 (46.39%)
Profitable trades (% of all) 249 (46.46%)
Loss trades (% of all) 287 (53.54%)
Largest
profitable trade 8.82
Deal Deal with loss -5.20
Average
1.10 Profit deal
Loss trade -0.93
Maximum number
Continuous wins (profit) 10 (31.80)
Continuous Losses (Loss) 18 (-21.67)
Max.
Continuous Profit (number of wins) 37.24 (9)
Continuous loss (number of losses) -35.36 (11)
Average
continuous winnings 4
Continuous loss 4

And for some reason my net profit for Friday is 11.10.

Bars in history 2326
Modelled ticks 15050
Simulation quality 25.00%
Chart mismatch errors 0
Initial deposit 300.00
Net profit -11.10
Total profit 20.80
Total Loss -31.90
Profitability 0.65
Expected payoff -1.01
Absolute drawdown 41.10
Maximum drawdown 53.20 (16.08%)
Relative drawdown 16.08% (53.20)
Total trades 11
Short positions (% of winners) 4 (100.00%)
Long positions (% of winners) 7 (28.57%)
Profitable trades (% of all) 6 (54.55%)
Profitable trades (% of all) 5 (45.45%)
Largest
profitable transaction 5.00
Loss trade -10.70
Average
profitable deal 3.47
Loss trade -6.38
Maximum number
continuous wins (profit) 6 (20.80)
Continuous Losses (Loss) 5 (-31.90)
Maximum
Continuous Profit (number of wins) 20.80 (6)
Continuous loss (number of losses) -31.90 (5)
Average
continuous winnings 6
continuous loss 5

 
Cmu4:

Vadim, and everyone else, change your approach to logic! Your losses are not limited, but your profits are. With such an approach, nothing will work.

If you cut profits, cut losses too. The question is how? I manage to do it with the ratio of lots to profits/losses. But there are plenty of other ways...

I'm not involved here. I just don't understand how people manage to earn on such a completely losing Expert Advisor.

Limiting of losses and profits is right. I have done so.

 
Zhunko:

I'm not involved here. I just don't understand how people manage to make money on a completely flawed EA.

Limiting losses and profits is right. I have done it that way.


Friday was a bad day, take it from Monday
1...124125126127128129130131132133134135136137138...882
New comment
Reason: