The market is a controlled dynamic system. - page 438

You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Has it been about turtles and a flat Earth yet?))) I think that's where it's going.
comehere, star of david... Maybe you'll say something clever there... compete with your fellow smart guys... however, the best thing for you is martingale...
Hasn't it been about turtles and a flat Earth yet?))) I think that's what it's all about.
Andrey Pogoreltsev. What is it about... A hard case...
A wonderful lecture.
Part 1.
.
Rare nonsense, a typical example of a cobbler taking up songwriting, or a chemist trying to campaign for a revision of physics, with a very poor understanding of physics itself.
Rare nonsense, a typical example of a cobbler taking up songwriting, or a chemist trying to agitate for a review of physics, with a very poor understanding of physics itself.
this "song" has been known for a long time... open your eyes, "like a physicist"...
A limited set of closed triangles can be formed from the set of currency pairs offered by the BC:
.
In more general terms :
or in this representation :
.
In its most general form, a ring including all available currency pairs can be constructed :
.
The direction of movement of currency pairs of the triangle depends on the ratio of velocities of the currencies comprising the triangle.
Knowing the direction of movement and velocities of the currencies comprising the triangle uniquely determines the optimal working currency pair and trading direction.
About the velocity of currencies is interesting. If only in more detail.
s - trajectory of movement
ds/dt - speed of movement
If the trajectory of the currency is known, its velocity can be determined.
And to do this, the task of determining the trajectories of the currencies that make up the "triangle" is set and solved.About trends.
The simplest model with three different-scale fluctuations.
Why 3 and not 53?
Why 3 and not 53?
if you don't understand, you could foolishly shoot 3333.
That's what you do, you don't understand the phenomenon - you're only interested in your colorful moving pictures.
You're probably completely unfamiliar with the concept of the dominant component of the movement - ask yourself.
and try to determine what each component of the movement contributes to the overall movement.
Maybe then you'll understand...
I have no desire to talk to you -- ignore me.