You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
It's not about specific currency pairs.
The "tool" is a bit of a mess?
The "tool" was a bit of a letdown?
And the "tool" had nothing to do with it. It's my mistake, I'll fix it.
And the "tool" has nothing to do with it. It's my mistake, I'll fix it.
I'd be happy if you could get it right
I'd be happy if you could straighten things out properly
Thank you for your participation. )
Thank you for your participation. )
You're welcome...
.
REPAIR
You're repairing something that hasn't broken yet.
REMONT
and is the black line a plan drawn from a streetlight?
Looks like Tara is right...
.
What obvious flaws and inconsistencies in the theory of electricity are easy to find even in school physics textbooks. What postulates of modern science turn out to be implausible when viewed from a new perspective. Why do the views of physicists and chemists on the same phenomenon sometimes contradict each other completely? Whether there is a generalised formula for energy, how gravitation and electricity are related, what in fact is what we believe the Earth's gravitational field is, how to build an electrostatic propulsion machine. In his conversation with Dmitry Peretolchin, philosopher, natural scientist Vadim Lovchikov raises these and other questions that change the view of the modern scientific paradigm.