[Archive! - page 357
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Second try. Now you can.
It didn't take long for the "old girl" to suffer...
the "old girl" didn't suffer long...
>We have to walk the walk. There are three figures.
1 Real state
2 the state, taking into account local falsifications (to be taken into account by local leaders)
3 the state announced by Churov
By obtaining real and improved figures, the authorities understand the true mood of the people.
Upon analyzing the data, the authorities must stop responding to the people with their asses to the contrary and must adjust their sights to the divergence between the actual facts and their expectations.
Then, the authorities, in the person of Churov, must come up with and voice a figure that is between their own desires with the theoretical possibility of a Maidan on one side and a similar truth on the other...
Thus, in spite of the lies, not a single vote goes to waste in principle and has an indirect influence on power.
The more passive voters there are, the more the Yedra can be drawn without fear of people protesting.
There are at least FOUR numbers. The first of which is total voter turnout. Right now it is 60.2%. These are the people to whom the subject of government in general and elections in particular are not alien in principle. The remaining 39.8% are the people who don't give a fuck about what is going on up there. These people, though they are subject to it, but they are not controlled by the subject of governance in general. These people do not feel the need to get involved also because they are sure of their future regardless of what is going on up there.
In addition, election results can also be viewed "horizontally", e.g. by the time of arrival of the figures and the dynamics of the CEC's percentages.
Thus, the first figures are mostly indicative of the opinion (and the degree of fraud) in big cities and in cities in general. The last data come from such remote places, where "half an hour by helicopter and 12 by sledge". I am not talking about regional percentages at all.
DaddyJohn, don't twist things around - 146.47% is a screenshot from the video at the moment the numbers change, as you can see by the distance between 5 and 6.
I don't understand why they waste time counting votes at all. They should have written it down roughly. Let's let Yedro win roughly with 58% of the vote...... so.... Let's give the Comunists 20. The Liberal Democratic Party will get, I don't know, let's say 18% But it'll be ????
It's OK - NORMAL!!!!!!! So it was decided.
Why even bother printing these ballots at all?????
DaddyJohn, don't twist things around - 146.47% is a screenshot from the video at the moment the numbers change, as you can see by the distance between 5 and 6.
Let me clarify your point about those who do not care. Suddenly they are joined by liberals who call for a boycott of the election or spoil the ballot (Nemtsov, Milov, Shenderovich, etc.). It turns out that they are collaborators or just plain unintelligent people. Either way, I am crossing them out and will not support their parties and movements.
DaddyJohn, don't overreact - 146.47% is a screenshot from the video at the moment of changing the numbers, as you can see by the distance between 5 and 6.
Don't be ridiculous Captain Mosquito. If you were following this process, you would know that when changing, fractions of percentages were changed and there can be no such skewness from the change.
It's just a technical glitch, albeit a symbolic one.
But it doesn't matter, the important thing is that you are now about a warrant officer.
..... In any case, I am crossing them out and will not support their parties and movements.
-Can I not come?
-You can, then I'm crossing you off. (с)