Don't tell me then that TA doesn't work - page 5
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
You just want to talk? Open the book, the graphical methods section, the head and shoulders figure, and read the set of steps that need to be taken to make a profit. Identification, breakout, opening a position, etc.
Fucking wikipedia should be torn down! It's a wide-open area for everyone to poke around in.
That's nice!
And you've done all this, tested it and concluded that it's a dud?
May I enquire about the results?
the results are deplorable. Woe and tears. Plague, pestilence and devastation.
Right. Before you can say that any method is a wretched one, you should first test it, oddly enough.
Otherwise there will be plague, pestilence and devastation.
I have found the gift of silence. Looking...
hide. That's Spiderkas. I can't hold out much longer.
Right. Before you can say that any method is dreary, you should check it out first, oddly enough.
Otherwise there will be plague, pestilence and devastation.
have you checked?
Right. Before you can say that any method is dreary, you should check it out first, oddly enough.
Otherwise there will be plague, pestilence and devastation.
In fact, strange as it may seem, I think graphic methods are what almost everyone has checked in the beginning of TA
In fact, strangely enough, I think graphical methods are what almost everyone checked at the beginning of TA.
How did you check, by eye? You need a code to check it. For example, a level breakout can be checked quite easily.
How did you check, by eye? You need a code to check.
Do you have the code to check such graphical shapes? Bring it on. I thought such patterns were extremely difficult to algorithmise. Hats off to you.
Do you have code to check such graphical figures? Put it out there. I thought such patterns were extremely difficult to algorithmize. Hats off to you.
Well, all figures are made up of segments. For example GP: +a-a+b-b+a-a, where b>a.