Forex trading, does it make sense? - page 14

 
ZZZEROXXX:

on forex? in your kitchen? to invest 1 million quid? I'm afraid you're kidding. With that kind of money it makes no sense to deal with Forex. it makes sense to trade on real exchanges, and to do without kooky tricks.

You have to understand that Forex is not a kitchen and that a kitchen is not Forex. If you take it literally, they are two completely different things. What do you mean by "kitchen"?
 
FreeLance:

Don't work... Or stop working.

After all, the root of 'work' is slave!

Just work hard once in a while...

;)

How is it interesting to just work once in a while? I don't quite get it, and the family that let's just eat once in a while too, depending on the frequency of work. Maybe the root of the word "work" is "slave", but I have the feeling that the root of the word trader is "sucker", albeit not very well.

FreeLance 08.02.2011 01:58

Dreaming is easy and pleasant.

But thinking - hard and difficult.

(c) Ushinsky.

Found a definition of what a dream recently ...

Plans for the future that do not match your financial, mental and physical abilities are called dreams.

 
LeoV:

You have to understand that forex is not a kitchen and a kitchen is not forex. If you take it literally, they are two completely different things. What do you mean by "kitchen"?

You are right, they are a bit different things. a kitchen is any DT in my understanding. or a bank in some cases.
 
ZZZEROXXX: If you are offended by a brokerage company or a bank in some cases, you are right.


If you are offended by a brokerage company or a bank, it does not mean that all brokerage companies or banks are kitchens. You just need to get in touch with the "right" organisations. You have to understand that if you want to use a financial instrument as a brokerage company or bank and when you have chosen it, it is a pyramid scheme or some other unfair organisation trying to scam its clients, this does not mean that all brokerage companies or banks are like that. Also we need to understand that a client working with brokerage companies may not read the rules and understand the nuances of the chosen brokerage company and this may lead to problems not because of brokerage companies, but because of the client that may not agree with the rules of the game. But for this, first of all, we should have read the operating rules of the brokerage company and learned the nuances of work, because working on financial markets involves some peculiarities that a client should know and if he does not know them before he starts, it does not mean that he is right after he finishes. So there are too many nuances to be aware of and not to lump everyone together.

To give you an example, just to be clear, here is a man who works with over a million dollars. And nothing - by all appearances, he is very satisfied and does it well ))))

 
LeoV:


If you are offended by some brokerage company or bank, it does not mean that all brokerage companies or banks are cunts. You just need to get in touch with the "right" organisations. You have to understand that if you want to use a financial instrument as a brokerage company or a bank for profit, and when you have chosen it, it is a pyramid scheme or some other unfair organisation trying to scam its clients, it does not mean that all brokerage companies or banks are like that. Also we need to understand that a client working with brokerage companies may not read the rules and understand the nuances of the chosen brokerage company and this may lead to problems not because of brokerage companies, but because of the client that may not agree with the rules of the game. But for this, first of all, we should have read the operating rules of the brokerage company and learned the nuances of work, because working on financial markets involves some peculiarities that a client should know and if he does not know them before he starts, it does not mean that he is right after he finishes. So there are too many nuances to be aware of and not to lump everyone together.

To give you an example, just to be clear, here is a man who works with over a million dollars. And nothing - by all appearances, he is very satisfied and does it well ))))

This person is the face of the service (advertisement) why should he be bad. But the pips are not paid for - it is unclear - orders work! They provide a service and then refuse from it - it is unclear. (Why do people go to small brokerage companies - it is unclear if it is because of the spread in 1pp).
 

Tantrik: этот человек лицо сервиса (реклама)


Why do you think so?
 

There is no need to equate a bank and a DC. If the former at least has a licence and it can be taken away, they have something to lose. The second may not care about anything at all if they want to. In addition, banks, for example, are obliged to inform the client about all commitments on the loan - read financial services - therefore they cannot blame the client for not having read the agreement. Is it normal for brokerage companies to refer to the fact that the client has not read the regulation? The legislation on FCs and Forex is underdeveloped and there is no requirement to the regulation - that is why it is written anyway 1) intentionally confusing and ambiguous 2) favoring brokerage companies - and this is correct from the brokerage companies point of view. I have never had and will never have problems with CA, because this financial institution is not suitable for serious work for the reasons mentioned above. These are my reasons for not serious work. Even with small resources it is better to trade on the normal exchange market with a transparent mechanism for the formation of the transactions. Everything else is a kitchen. But of course everyone determines the degree of self-deception and risk.

As for the link to the pamm - you need to soberly assess the value and purpose of such charts - to attract clients.

 

about pamm - not a pamm, but also "real" ht tp://informer.rts.ru/en/graph/gr003/3-0-431-20081205-0.gif

N1 is so "real" that even on days when there was no trading ))))

 
Clearly the credentials aren't his, they're Alpari's )) Who says they are his diplomas?
 
ZZZEROXXX:

There is no need to equate a bank and a DC. If the former at least has a licence and it can be taken away, they have something to lose. The second may not give a damn about anything if he wants to.

I'm just astonished at statements of fraud by a brokerage company. People who have not been cheated because they just haven't traded with real money.)

How do you want it? You have been given a free terminal, free quotes, free order execution - use it, learn, gain experience - with experience - go ahead and ruin banks, brokers, the whole Forex ... ))))))))))

SZZY: Just sit on MT forum and say that you are "worth a visit" - the worst thing you can do for your own self-satisfaction ;)

SZS ¹2: Oh, yes, somewhere in an unknown country there is a miracle-Yudo-broker without commissions, with a super platform, and there's no need to think, but take the money and rake it with a golden spatula.

Reason: