Technical analysis - A scam for beginners? - page 45
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
maybe it was a leather trunk... that bent... and Grandpa was making money with it... :)
Maybe it was a leather barrel... that bent... and my grandfather was making money with it... :)
I don't recommend porn either. You can get chronic looseness.
But I'm too late for that advice.
Tantrik
Don't get distracted... Discuss the analysis... here we go - the fool will post the grail...
I hope you're not talking about me.
It's been a week. Let's take stock.
What conclusions can be drawn?
40 pages of flubbery. A couple or three clever posts. No stats at all. The local "public" doesn't make money trading on TA.
That is indirect evidence thatTA is "bullshit sucked out of a phalo organ" and spit out in the Internet in order to bait newbies and organize a sluggish Big Financial Pyramid called "Forex".
Or maybe I'm wrong and someone can post the stats ? Someone can prove the real work of TA with his steat?
PS: (to Matemat): About neural networks. And what exactly is it if it is not a technical analysis? Exactly what it is, only in a beautiful "mathematical wrapper", inside of which - who knows what. The very thing that will become a "surprise" in real trading. It is the same "Dashka in a veil" only not in a "skirt" but in "jeans". Replace the neural network with a system of linear equations and everything becomes clear.
Or maybe I'm wrong and someone can post the stats? Can someone prove the real work of TA with his/her steute?
Richie, what's the point of it? Look at the statements, what's the point of these statements?
To prove that it is not the trader's real finger, but a robot written by the same fingers that makes the opening and closing buttons more efficient?
If someone has an Expert Advisor and is increasing his deposit in small steps, he can't prove anything at all.
It's been a week. Let's take stock.
What conclusions can be drawn?
What is the indirect proof that TA is "bullshit sucked out of a phallus organ" and spit out on the Internet with the purpose of baiting newbies and organizing a sluggish Big Financial Pyramid called "forex".
Or maybe I'm wrong and someone can post the stats ? Can someone prove the real work of TA with their steat?
Some people search their whole lives for a grail, some people just look at the chart and earn money, those who have searched for a grail their whole lives will write a clever book at their old age and the next generations of strategy speculators will earn on it and "prove" why the author of the book did not earn money. There are no grails in nature and cannot be, the same basic laws of physics do not work in another space.
P.S. Can you prove that there are no grails ? )
Ritchie, let's be clear... what is TA?
Or better yet, look even deeper into the very essence of trading. Let's remove the concept of TA altogether. What's left then?
I think that no one in his right mind and mind will buy or sell without doing at least some analysis.
How can you even argue, deny or refute TA if you don't know what it is? A bar is TA, a tick is also TA. No TA means no Price and no Deals. News is TA, any number or body move that leads to your decision is also TA.
The question you have to answer yourself - what is TA, so when you answer it, you come with this explanation and ask about it - who works according to your concept.
Be "yes, yes" or "no, no". And don't start a flooded thread without defining the paradigm of your world, by whose rules you live and ask others to live.
...
PS: (to Matemat): About neural networks. And what exactly is that if it is not technical analysis? Exactly what it is, but in a beautiful "mathematical wrapper", inside of which - who knows what. The very thing that will become a "surprise" in real trading. It is the same "Dashka in a veil" only not in a "skirt" but in "jeans". Replace the neural network with a system of linear equations and everything becomes clear.
Guys. How many times...
ANN is not TA. ANN is a non-linear transducer. What you let it analyze, that's what you get from the ANN. :)
//---------------------------------------
Give it a TA, you get shit.... :D
TA candy, you don't get ... nikogta.
//---------------------------------------
Sorry, couldn't resist, the rhyme is just good.
And sergeev is right, you need a clear idea of what you want from this life. And you need to ask questions more clearly.
What conclusions can be drawn?
There are no states at all. => The local "public" does not make money by trading on TA.
More than a strange conclusion.
And you can generate a 3 years' worth of stats, at the beginning of the thread I gave a login to an account where the trader has been trading TA for more than 3 years. But not all 3 years with a constant lot, of course.
It's been a week. Let's take stock.
What conclusions can be drawn?
40 pages of flubbery. A couple or three clever posts. No stats at all. The local "public" doesn't make money trading on TA.
Which is circumstantial evidence thatTA is "bullshit sucked out of a phalo organ"
Exactly. And the statistics are the same. Statistically, the average Russian has one boob and one egg. Have you ever seen such a Russian?
No . Then the statistics are pseudoscience and shit. Genius