sanyooooook: That's the truth, and no other theorem can do it, and the fact that your graph has lines about the same, so don't believe your eyes
Guys!
Honestly, you are first class jokers!
Many pages earlier I had already written a solution where the cathetuses are reduced to the same calculus system.... and it works... regardless of scale, compression, stretching...
Many pages earlier I had already written a solution where the cathetuses are reduced to the same calculus system.... and it works... regardless of scale, compression, stretching...
The guys aren't messing around, they're explaining basic mathematics to you, peckerwood. So, dude, drink yadda and kill yourself. You're the fool, not them. You're a real asshole.
Many pages earlier I had already written a solution where the cathetuses are reduced to the same calculus system.... and it works... regardless of scale, compression, stretching...
It's all bullshit, comparable to the following expression: "I need to know the distance, from point A, to three minutes past five."
Allow the use of cookies to log in to the MQL5.com website.
Please enable the necessary setting in your browser, otherwise you will not be able to log in.
You are signed in. Two-factor authentication has been disabled. Set it up again and scan a new QR code, or continue with two-factor authentication disabled.
OK
length one squared = (0.1444*0.1444)+(40*40) = the root of 1600.021 = 40
length two squared = (0.2812*0.2812)+(3*3) = the root of 9.079 = 3.01
what do we got?
the length of the first hypotenuse and the length of the second hypotenuse
I have purposely given an example where these hypotenuse are EQUAL
Is 40 equal to 3.01?
I purposely gave an example where these hypotenuses are EQUAL
Is 40 equal to 3.01?
are you doubting the accuracy of your calculations?
Either you're not aware of what you think, or...?
Or are you mocking... I don't get it anymore...
The Pythagorean theorem does not allow you to use the cathetuses expressed in different systems of calculus
AlexSTAL:
The Pythagorean theorem does not allow you to use the cathetuses expressed in different systems of calculus
OK
length one squared = (0.1444*0.1444)+(40*40) = the root of 1600.021 = 40
length two squared = (0.2812*0.2812)+(3*3) = the root of 9.079 = 3.01
what do we got?
That's the truth, and no other theorem can do it, and the fact that your graph has lines about the same, so don't believe your eyes
Guys!
Honestly, you are first class jokers!
Many pages earlier I had already written a solution where the cathetuses are reduced to the same calculus system.... and it works... regardless of scale, compression, stretching...
Guys!
Honestly, you are first class jokers!
Many pages earlier I had already written a solution where the cathetuses are reduced to the same calculus system.... and it works... regardless of scale, compression, stretching...
The guys aren't messing around, they're explaining basic mathematics to you, peckerwood. So, dude, drink yadda and kill yourself. You're the fool, not them. You're a real asshole.
Guys!
Honestly, you are first class jokers!
Many pages earlier I had already written a solution where the cathetuses are reduced to the same calculus system.... and it works... regardless of scale, compression, stretching...
The guys aren't messing around, they're explaining basic math to you, peckerwood. So, dude, drink yadda and kill yourself. You're the fool, not them.