LET'S FIND OUT WHO HAS LOST THE MOST MONEY ON THE FOREX MARKET AND FOR HOW LONG !!!! - page 12
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
bought, sold, bought, sold.
It couldn't be easier.)
I'm on the plus side, I don't know how much, but I've covered the minuses for good =)))
my advice is to take it off in time and hum until it gets bad
when discussing any strategy, any automated system that takes money from forex, everyone makes forecasts, by price movement, by history - that's great ...! If you don't know what's going on in your EA, you may have missed the chance to analyze your sl and tp (you told him about them), what prevents him from swinging the price to the highest sl and lowest tp accumulations... nothing (like strange "technical" candlesticks) and so on... When testing on the history of EAs with completely missing information on technical signals - go into euphoria with its readings - all in profit, then get lazy and go straight to the money on the demo, and then get depressed... But why get upset? You fight and he fights, and the one who knows more about the opponent's plans wins as usual. A technical signal such as a temporary (10-20 min) increase in the level, sometimes significantly, affects the work of advisers, what kind of advisers? Well, you can guess)) ...As if it's accepted that the BC gives such a signal before important news, but in fact it's not like that, except for news my DC generously uses them)) I had to make a simple indicator to visualize them, during the signal you can not test and optimize, the results are like falling from a tree - a completely different currency pair, as if the BC has given that signal, can say about gaps and many other things ...... it's a stock market process, no way-it's a fight against us )) and what do you say about MA, RSI and other stuff from the standard supply ... for example hypothetically, all traders trade against forex without sl or tp - it starts moving the market with less profits for the enemy (...) one widely advertised brokerage house has a spread with buy and sell orders (most probably his site) and the price usually moves with few orders )) for example buy59% sell-41% - surely sell will always end up in profits )) that's my experience.
Maybe it's off-topic even if it's a matter of joy and disappointment )) Just Forex is not a Klondike (maybe I misspelled it) where you have to think and dig, it's rather a mine with lots of wealth and evil dwarfs, you need to keep an eye on your opponent, he's watching us ... he won't give up so easily ... that's really beside the point ;)
You should distinguish between forex and DTs.
It's true that sometimes they are happy to "throw" their prices up by the accumulation of SL. And if you want to get rid of them, don't worry, you'll get lost.
Some of them even say so openly - we take quotes from different sources and mix them to meet the needs of our clients. And how you mix it up - there is silence in response.
Trend and flat are abstract and subjective
Mm-hmm.
no one can give accurate definitions of a trend or a flat.
Bullshit. Speak for yourself.
Trend and flat as well as TA are perfectly recognisable and defined POTUS
Uh-huh. Like everything else in this shitty life. To be recognized, an event has to happen first. What's all this blah-blah-blah, anyway? It's not like we're drinking port in the driveway...
To learn how to win you have to learn how to lose....
Yes.
You have to work hard to start making money.
Mm-hmm.
Bullshit. Speak for yourself.
Mm-hmm. Like everything else in this shitty life. To be recognized, an event has to happen first. What's all this blah-blah-blah, anyway? It's not like we're drinking port in the driveway...
bullshit, bazaar, shitty life, blah blah blah, portmanteau....
I see that the internet has opened up the way to forex for people of the people! That's good to see.
Maybe you can teach people and give a precise and unambiguous definition of a trend and a flat? Because I see that you are very smart, maybe you will teach us axiomatics?
Or are you just being clever?
It is the same as in life: many students study, get a profession, but only few become real surgeons, teachers, welders, etc. It is the same at Forex: only few real specialists, and life eliminates superfluous ones. Each person has to find his own self. Everyone has to find his own self, the one who believes that it is a scam or casino, unfortunately Forex is not for him. One must look for oneself in something else.
I think that 80-99% of 100 people who enter medical school will become doctors, surgeons, and so on.
Out of 100 for pedagogical institute, 85 - 99% will become teachers.
So will welders, etc.
And in the financial markets? On the contrary