
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
A pretty competent trade in my opinion.
Licking the market for all it's worth.
joo has a point, in my opinion.
AND YOU?!
Well, what's to stop him from taking the same entry and exit points to mt5
Tex
I'm off to "humor" for good.
AND YOU ?!
Well, what's to stop him from slipping everything into mt5 with the same entry and exit points
I think no one will, if MTS does it.
But with human needs (Maslov with his pyramid comes to mind ;) - the lock gives time to rest, and most importantly! - opportunity to assess the situation and make an informed decision.
----
Denis Orlov clearly distinguished between stop and lock.
Good post. Bingo!
About locks: a trailing stop is different from a stop, just as a drawdown is different from a stop, from Breakeven, or even from a profit.
A stop is an incurred loss, a loss of funds.
Lock is a fixed drawdown, with the possibility of waiting for the reversal, but still be able to earn on the drawdown. And you can always close it like a stop loss, minus swaps of course.
I think everything depends on the strategy. I think the lock is applicable to the reversal strategy, when the reversal is "postponed", but very likely.
Mischek:
So what's to stop him from using the same entry and exit points to slice everything into mt5?
So who's going to let him open counter-positions?
And reducing the positions won't lead to anything. If only to the lost profit, at least.
Read that as a loss.
So who's going to let him open counter-positions?
And reducing the positions won't lead to anything. Unless there's at least some shortfall in profits.
Read that as a loss.
You have an error
Figure it out on your own.
So who's going to let him open counter-positions?
And reducing the positions won't lead to anything. Unless there's at least some shortfall in profits.
Read that as a loss.
Not according to the arithmetic. If you keep applying the tactic.
But again according to the report - losses, not profits ;)
Although the arithmetic of netting and countering is similar.
The psychological perception is different.
You've got it wrong.
Sort it out yourselves.
That's not very gentlemanly...
I don't recognize it. ;)
in terms of arithmetic, it's not really true. if you keep applying the tactics.
But again according to the report - losses, not gains ;)
Although the arithmetic of netting and countering is similar.
The psychological perception is different.
OK.
At a glance, when trading counter orders without closing the current positions, 1800 pips were taken.
Show me, if you do not mind, how and how much will be taken on netting.
You have the error
Handle it yourself
After all we've been through? :)
I'll come back, I'm lazy now.
OK.
At a glance, when trading counter orders without closing the current positions, 1800 pips were taken.
Show me, if you don't mind, how and how much will be taken on netting.
The same.
Just record your trades. and check through netting.