You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Pour water in the spirit of Niroba! :)
Didn't get it, sorry. :(
Well, you can do this. Disable genetics, and with ha disabled, run two, already identical, because they can no longer change, experts on two accounts (with and without banning loks).
True, the profits won't be the same since evolution will be disabled, but it's interesting to compare platforms, isn't it?
Please comment on what was said wrong?
I don't get it, sorry. :(
I was trying to make a joke -- it didn't work.
I'm sorry.
joo:
It's true that the profits won't be the same since evolution will be disabled, but it's interesting to compare platforms, isn't it?
Also an interesting idea. That's probably what we should do.
Also an interesting idea. That's probably what we should do.
If the profit is negative, it is a loss.
Then that's what we'll do. :)
Great. :)
By the way, will the anti-loks still not netting us?
The balance sheet is growing faster than the loss... Therefore, on the equity we make a profit with a "+" sign...
Balance sheet + unallocated profit/loss = Equity.
Equity "current" - Equity "previous" = "current" financials.
Right?
And it's profit, since it's greater than zero.
;)
Balance sheet + unallocated profit/loss = Equity.
Equity "current" - Equity "previous" = "current" financials.
Right?
And it's profit, since it's greater than zero.
;)
Great. :)
By the way, will the anti-loks still not netting us?
I haven't found any...
It seemed like shamanism to you. Or was it also a joke?