Probability, how do you turn it into a pattern ...? - page 68
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Развлекалка ..............
Лот расчитываете от дэпо ............. 00.1 или 0.1 ........... на картинке я просто показал 1 лот с шагом 10pip (так нагляднее и проще считать)
Весь прикол этой хохмы, в том, что даже если вам нехватает дэпо, то вы, закрываясь в любой точке, при любой просадке, всегда сохраняете дэпо.
Правила: TP= SL= Step, стопов нет.
закрывается вся пирамида, при получении профита на ордер по провисающему напрввлению.
Реально работает! (но это так, баловство или наглядный пример, как можно приручить мартина)
If after step 4 (8s - 8b), before the wave reverses, the depo starts to fall short, then by the numbers we get+100,+200, +400 - blocked
eight, it is clear, they are the same and in total zero
-300, -400, -400 - from hanging minuses and it is only at the moment of start of the 4th step, further it will be only more
So the statement that the depo will be saved at any point does not work.
Пример с разруленным локом, я демонстрировал исключительно в целях примера возможного выхода из лока с профитом.
Но статистически эта примочка помогла мне очень сильно и вот в каком моменте. Если работая по продемонстрированной схеме из 10 входов в рынок, я получу 9 завершенных циклов, а один достигнет предельной просадки и я его принудительно закрою (недопустив кола) и при этом не потеряю ровным счетом ничего. То в чем проблема?
Assuming that all price movements are non-deterministic (i.e. random), if you lose nothing, you gain nothing either - you are left with nothing. The 50/50 law works here - no matter how much you flip a coin. Then it becomes like pouring nothing into nothing.
What is the point of it?
Of course, that's if there is no spread. And if there's a spread, it's just feeding the establishment. All the more reason not to.Так что утверждение о том, что депо сохранится в любой точке не работает.
The top starter is not saying that, it's not lock, it's martin. Lock is only on the first level (at the start), then martin: 1s, 2s, 4s - on the second, third and fourth levels respectively.
Мартин вульгарисУпакованный с локами
судьба абсолютно тажа что и у мартина обыкновенного
--------------------------------------------------------------
В Ялте вас будут бить
ну если догонят конечно
Остапу в Васюках повезло
________________________________________________
Остается вопрос -вы разводите или всё еще хуже, сами ни в дугу не вьезжаете
пыспыс, И кстати да, как заметил api , рисунок левый
точно бить будут
--------------------------------
В Ялте тусовки обычно проходят в гостинице Ялта
не берите ресторан на последнем этаже, дорога к лифтам будет отрезана, берите Хрустальный
или бункер, там за сценой через гримерки выход сразу в холл
потом ныряйте в подземный переход на пляж и в Турцию, в Антарктиду, куда угодно ...
+5 ))))"If you have open orders, there is a current drawdown, and you close them at anypoint you like, the DEPO is saved? It seems to me, that in this case your orders must be ++. If they are in --, then closing the drawdown will lead to DEPO eating out, partial or full - it all depends on your "magic point". But it will be eaten. If I'm wrong, please correct me.
Yes, the theme has become similar to the neighbour's dog barking, so it's time to pour your entire system into a finished narrative, cut the diamond that would allow a newcomer to get acquainted with this work in one go, without wandering around the topic in search of seeds of truth, and not engaged in cleaning grains from chaff. THE FINISHED, CONCRETE, ELABORATED MATERIAL TO THE MASSES!
Yes, indeed, a strange expression.
But, one can try to understand its meaning.
Suppose we had a 100% lock, then if we ran out of securities (because of the increase of the pledge amount, but not because of the drawdown, because there would not be any), then we simply could not open further (to increase the size of the lock). And that was it. The result is that all funds are pledged. At "any point". Closed all orders at "any point" - again ALL funds are available. Nothing has changed. The deposit is maintained in any case. There is no drawdown and cannot be.
But since the lock is not 100%, but only half (approximately), and half of it is a martin, and if they say "drawdown", they mean a martin. Perhaps what is meant here is that if you close at any point within the limits of the depo, you will not lose it completely. I.e. you will save it at least partially.
But there is another interpretation.
By "point" here we mean some area where you start to run out of depo, and in this area you can always close at break-even point, without going bad, and by keeping the depo at 100%. But how to achieve this ALWAYS (by taming the martin) is not clear from the above scheme.
скажите кто-нибудь все таки понял как второй цикл завершать правильно?
I got it.
Here's a tip:
1. you take the stack from the beginning of the branch, reread the branch.
2. Add lines CLOSE orders,
3. Sort by time of each event,
3. find the value of each instrument (quote archive in МТ4) by the time of each event
4. Calculate the point value for each instrument,
5. Calculate the balance for the basket of orders at the moment of each action (Misha has 79 of them), reread the branch
and everything is falling into place.
The problem is not luck, so I wish you patience.
Entertainer ..............
You calculate the lot from the depo ............. 00.1 or 0.1 ........... in the picture I just showed 1 lot in 10pip increments (it's easier to see and calculate).
The funny thing about this is that even if you are short of the deposit, you always save the deposit by closing at any point, at any drawdown.
The rules are: TP= SL= Step, no stops.
all the pyramid is closed, when you get a profit on the order on the slack.
It really works! (but it's just for fun, or a simple example of how you can tame a martin)
To dispel superstition: