Mathemat>>: И все это - при весьма умеренной прибыльности. Очень интересно!
Unfortunately, if you select results with a profit margin of 2 or more, they are likely to show a small number of trades with a normal lot. There is no confidence in such results.
Reverse RSI with the following features: - optimization on 2000-2006, forward on 2006-2010 -Signals are reversed on every loss -This tactic is controlled by the balance curve -in turn, the signals of the control tactic are controlled by the resulting balance, whose signals are also interchanged (measurement 2 by Safonov) -for forward, 1 topmost optimization run is selected. There was no overshoot of the optimization results -forward starts from the 2700th trade somewhere -notice the recovery factor.
Yes, this is interesting: the profitable trades are less than half of the losing ones! On the other hand, that's a 2.7x increase in depo over 9 years, i.e. about 20% per year (if the trades are spread roughly evenly over the years). I.e. it is very modest, a couple of times higher than today's bank rate.
Mathemat>>: Да, вот тут интересно: прибыльных сделок меньше половины убыточных! С другой стороны, это рост депо в 2.7 раза за 9 лет, т.е. примерно 20% в год (если сделки распределены примерно равномерно по годам). Т.е. это очень скромно, в пару раз выше сегодняшнего банковского процента.
Well, in theory it is possible to reduce the initial deposit and get a higher percentage. A recovery factor of around 7 and a drawdown of 8% allows this.
Allow the use of cookies to log in to the MQL5.com website.
Please enable the necessary setting in your browser, otherwise you will not be able to log in.
You are signed in. Two-factor authentication has been disabled. Set it up again and scan a new QR code, or continue with two-factor authentication disabled.
И все это - при весьма умеренной прибыльности. Очень интересно!
I'm not a fan of Safonov, but these curves support his claim thatI should pause and reread it again, maybe something else will come to mind.
И все это - при весьма умеренной прибыльности. Очень интересно!
Unfortunately, if you select results with a profit margin of 2 or more, they are likely to show a small number of trades with a normal lot. There is no confidence in such results.- optimization on 2000-2006, forward on 2006-2010
-Signals are reversed on every loss
-This tactic is controlled by the balance curve
-in turn, the signals of the control tactic are controlled by the resulting balance, whose signals are also interchanged (measurement 2 by Safonov)
-for forward, 1 topmost optimization run is selected. There was no overshoot of the optimization results
-forward starts from the 2700th trade somewhere
-notice the recovery factor.
On the other hand, that's a 2.7x increase in depo over 9 years, i.e. about 20% per year (if the trades are spread roughly evenly over the years). I.e. it is very modest, a couple of times higher than today's bank rate.
Да, вот тут интересно: прибыльных сделок меньше половины убыточных!
С другой стороны, это рост депо в 2.7 раза за 9 лет, т.е. примерно 20% в год (если сделки распределены примерно равномерно по годам). Т.е. это очень скромно, в пару раз выше сегодняшнего банковского процента.
Well, in theory it is possible to reduce the initial deposit and get a higher percentage.A recovery factor of around 7 and a drawdown of 8% allows this.
Ну, теоретически можно уменьшить начальный депозит и получить больший процент.
Фактор восстановления около 7 и просадка 8% это позволяет.
Well in theory you could still reverse the trade. Buy=>Sell and vice versa. Go for it. Do not forget to post the state. :)
// Explanation. Just to keep it as a joke: the strategy should be reversed on wins, not on losses.
Ну теоретически ещё можно перевернуть торговлю. Buy=>Sell и наоборот. Дерзай. Не забудь стейт выложить. :)
// Пояснение. Чтоб совсем уж шуткой не выглядело: пущай стратегия переворачивается при выигрышах, а не при проигрышах.
You're already using a double flip :)You could of course build another dimension from above, but I think this is unnecessary for the time being