Avalanche - page 115

New comment
 
goldtrader писал(а) >>


No, I'm not wrong.
1. I've already written I don't use locking. It gives no advantage in anything. This is my strong opinion, I'm not going to argue or prove it.
2. I do runs on parmeters, where I get some holes in optimization maps and get the MC. In some cases it may happen that the deposit is enough and indeed the last position after the limited reversal is closed with a big loss. I.e. it depends on the ratio of start deposit/stop lot. But I chose it so as not to torment the tester for a long time.


Alright then. :)
 
goldtrader >>:

.........................
ЗЫ Боюсь что тема долго ещё не умрёт - кому-то это выгодно.

I don't think so. It's just that there are plenty of people here who confuse Santa Claus with Grandpa Alzheimer's.

 
lexandros писал(а) >>
ZS: GoldTrader's results are different because he did the optimisation... I didn't. Because I think that optimization is the greatest evil. If TS is promising - it doesn't need optimization... Or rather it needs it, of course, but only to improve its results. But TC that does not degrade only when optimized parameters are optimized and one step to the left / one step to the right - firing squad - is good only for one thing, to erase it from disk and forget it forever... (which is exactly what GoldTrader was talking about)

lexandros, I use the optimizer mainly to feel the potential of TC in terms of stability. For me it is not the optimization results that are much more important, but its map. If it doesn't have significant dips/holes in parameter deviation by 5-10-20%, it's a good sign. Otherwise (to this point) the TC is scrapped.
 
goldtrader >>:


lexandros, оптимизатором пользуюсь больше для того чтобы прочувствовать потенциал ТС в плане устойчивости. Для меня гораздо бОльшее значение имеют не результаты оптимизации, а её карта. Если она не имеет существенных провалов/дыр при отклонении параметров на 5-10-20%%, то это хороший знак. В противном случае (к в этом) ТС фтопку.


100% unanimous
 
goldtrader писал(а) >>

If it's no secret, what's the trailing stop value?
 
Yeah... trailing is present... And that's a VERY big difference... Trailing often pulls even inherently unprofitable TS...
If trailing is present, it is far from an avalanche... And most likely there is something else besides trailing...
 
And this is what I got after some minor tweaking
 
goldtrader писал(а) >>

...For me it is not the results of the optimisation that are much more important, but its map. If it has no significant dips/holes in parameter deviations of 5-10-20%, it is a good sign.....
Regardless of the tactics!!!, the idea!!!! of which is described here, it's just that for this "order closing mechanism" it turns out to be more illustrative.





 
khorosh >>:

Если ваш алгоритм соответствует алгоритму лавина, выложите график с одинаковыми условиями, чтобы можно было сравнивать. Интервал тестирования с 01.01.08 и начальный лот 0.01
И тестирование проведите по тикам. Тестирование по контрольным точкам годится только для проверки логических ошибок в программе и грубой проверки алгоритма, но не даёт информации о качестве советника.

No, the algorithm does not exactly match the algorithm, so I won't post it

 
sanyooooook писал(а) >>

No, the algorithm doesn't quite match this one, so I won't post it.


Is lot incremental locking used?
1...108109110111112113114115116117118119120121122...523
New comment