Thoughts on some of the absurdity of multi-currency analysis. - page 18

You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
I believe that "multi-currency analysis" itself for the purpose of predicting currency pair movements is simply not possible, because the movement of all currency pairs begins after at least one pair changes.
But analysis of the strength (amplitude) of currency pair changes or the duration of currency pair fluctuations, i.e. time frame analysis makes sense. If you can predict at least the duration of a short-term trend, you can have a good chance of making a successful transaction even without knowing in which direction the currency pair will move.
you learn from CNN about Greece's budget problems
you understand that Greece's budget problems will negatively affect EURUSD and you know the positive correlation between EURUSD and NZDUSD = you are closing your long position
is this a multi-currency analysis?
у вас открыта длинная позиция по NZDUSD
вы узначете из выпуска CNN про бюджетные проблемы Греции
вам понятно, что бюджетные проблемы Греции негативно скажутся на курсе EURUSD и вы знаете про положительную корреляция между EURUSD и NZDUSD = вы закрываете свою длинную позицию
это мультивалютный анализ?
have you ever thought about the "economic" influence of Greece? how a country like Greece can have an impact on the euro??? has anyone heard about minerals in Greece, about goods produced in Greece??? 90% of forex news are just news that cannot change the course of currency pairs, to excite for a couple of hours - yes, I agree, but countries like Greece cannot radically change the trend. As the saying goes: you are "looking for black cats missing in a dark room". Well, the correlation of currency pairs is not visible on all timeframesу вас открыта длинная позиция по NZDUSD
вы узначете из выпуска CNN про бюджетные проблемы Греции
вам понятно, что бюджетные проблемы Греции негативно скажутся на курсе EURUSD и вы знаете про положительную корреляция между EURUSD и NZDUSD = вы закрываете свою длинную позицию
это мультивалютный анализ?
The positive correlation here says nothing.
The same currency, the quid, is part of the pair. That is, the currencies themselves (Euro and NZ) may not depend on each other in any way. Correlations must be used properly. The fall of the Eurobucks does not have to affect the NZDbucks. In your case you are only betting that the quid will rise relative to 2 currencies at once.
2. Tell me about the minerals of Japan and the goods produced by Switzerland.
3. The forex market mostly operates with emotional news rather than economic ones. that's why the reaction of price movements is often completely inconsistent with the economic component.
4. Please explain to me the price movement from 04.12.2010 to today from 1.5141 to 1.3282 (most market participants explain this by problems in Greece etc.)
5. The correlation of currency pairs is visible at all intervals and at all times. It changes over time, can change its sign to the opposite, but never equals zero.
???
the other thing is that the fall is not proportional
that was an example
replace the NZD with the Fund
the correlation is even stronger there
Well, if the Forex market operates only on emotions, then it is completely unrelated to the economic model :)
Well, about the correlation - the correlation is always calculated based on already existing data and conclude how similar the behaviour of random variables was at a particular time interval. I don't know if the correlation is calculated for future movements of currency pairs :) .Correlation is a fitting of existing values to the time intervals. I, by the way, wrote four posts above - I believe that the movement of any currency pair causes the movement of other currency pairs - that's correlation for you.
and there may well be 854 other reasons which we do not know about, which "in fact" caused the downward trend.
But using Occam's razor, it's still more likely that it was Greece that crapped.
As for your point about the movement, I agree 100%.
but there is a VERY LARGE probability that if during the n-last period the correlation between two currencies was e.g. +0.82, tomorrow it will not be -0.25, and if it changes, it will be within a very narrow band
Of course, we do not take into account such extreme cases as:
1. market noise, e.g. correlation on 1-5 min timeframes
2. Release moments of super important macro news for the currencies in question.
ok?