[Archive!] Pure mathematics, physics, chemistry, etc.: brain-training problems not related to trade in any way - page 485
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
So that's not the point. Everyone is trying to unravel Kapanadze's circuitry - what's in the greenbox. Look at the films of his generator. There are many schemes on the internet, but clearly not many of them work. Kapanadze has built a 5kW generator and a 100kW one, so have a look at....
See also what Atsyukovsky said about his generator. He is an academician, as it were ....
That's not the point. Everyone is trying to unravel Kapanadze's circuitry - what's in the greenbox. Look at the films of his generator. There are a lot of schemes on the internet, but clearly not many of them work. Kapanadze has built a 5kW generator and a 100kW generator, so look at....
I did. Well here's another top ten thinker on your link... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XTQYjWHSkxg and what? the whole circuit is explained by classical electrical engineering - are you suggesting we double-check everything?
Give me a link to a device that can unambiguously be replicated, no innuendo or innuendo.
And why is Alexei (Matemat) silent? No opinion?
Yes, of course. There are so many different wires out there, you could fake anything.
Amateur video cannot be proof of any scientific facts. Only an experiment repeated by independent researchers can be proof. Is the full diagram of this device published in scientific publications or not?
Yes and I am also not versed in all this.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XTQYjWHSkxg
Here is the simplest diagram I could find on the internet, it doesn't show the alternator that powers the car coil, although it's clear. There is no complete diagram in the scientific publications, as far as I know.
Here is the simplest scheme
Where do the seven wires from this unit go?
Is this question supposed to confuse me? Do you mean to say to the power supply? The principle is that the unit should start from the power supply and then run itself without it. One of the wires is the ground. Frankly, that's not what I'm worried about - how and from where it gets its power, if it does, of course. According to Professor Atsyukovsky - from his beloved "ether".
Is this question supposed to stump me?
Even if the 'ground' is not a 'common' minus-5.
I asked for a reproducible circuit. You can do it without ferrite specifications, but at least with the type-nominals (if off-the-shelf ones are used) or with formulas for calculating inductances. (Ferrites are a separate topic... when I first saw the aiwa with the trans primary coil wound with the same cross section as the secondary, I couldn't believe my eyes).
Anyway... somewhere in the first posts on this subject on the site, the guy wrote honestly - he studied at that university. How he ended up - I don't know, but it does not look like a diploma.
Kapanadze said on Skype that there are no ferrite coils, there is no core. Regarding the cross-section, look at the picture on the previous page, all three windings are connected in series. Therefore the current in them is the same. Then why make them with different cross-section is not clear.
Conversation with Kapanadze.