How to make money from unsteady markets? (Article) - page 8
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
...If the market behaves completely randomly after each decision point, then there are no such stable scenarios. In short, it all depends on the correct selection of such points and on the correct problem statement in general.
....
The hardest thing is how to apply this tool, but so with everything :) imha
Well...
If the problem still boils down to determining the probability of the Market moving from one state to another, why "nirobit" and entertain neophytes with plausible arguments about "ways of enrichment"? And further complicate the root problem?
Markov chains (for instance) for multicurrency strategies can also be discussed. ;)
Except that it's a pity there won't be a discussion.
Neither the first question, nor any other.
The afftor, I suspect, had no intention of doing so...
Neither did Netrebka, who is dead from giving away his investment password (a key chip in his 'online trading').
Delusion disguised by science is the worst kind of flub! (c) Gardener.
;)
PS. I wish I was wrong...
We wait.
oops...
If the problem anyway comes down to determining the probability of transition from one state to another, why "nirobit" and entertain neophytes with plausible arguments about "ways of enrichment"? And further complicate the root problem?
Markov chains for multi-currency strategies can also be discussed (for example). ;)
Except that it's a pity there won't be a discussion.
Neither the first question, nor any other.
The author, I suspect, didn't intend to do so...
Neither did Netrebka, who is dead from issuing an investment password (a key chip in his "online trading").
Delusion disguised by science is the worst kind of flub! (c) Gardener.
;)
PS. I wish I were wrong...
Wait for it.
Fluderast, you'd better fuck off. Nothing useful has come from you at all on this forum and your face is annoying and unnerving.
Fluderast, you should fuck off. Nothing useful has come from you on this forum at all and your face is annoying and unnerving.
I hope my face is making your asshole itch no less, or at least comparable in its overall effect on your body. :о) But seriously, Sorento is exactly right.
Bullshit disguised by science is the worst kind of flooding! (c) Gardener.
That suffers and Mr. Reshetov in his articles and chief among the fluder here Reshetov (objectively - if you really think through the bullshit that our scientist writes). And especially surprising, his turkey pouting after what he wrote. It's just adorable. :о)
Yuri, fuck all the nerds who can only tell you how white they are.
Nerds, we're waiting for a working theory and working code from you. If you have nothing to add, go to hell.
:-)
That's probably why it's called "edge problem" ? Because where you adjust that wavelet, there will be an edge. It doesn't decide by itself how it will lie on the chart.
It goes where it needs to, not where it wants to, unlike FFT. By analogy: a pattern starts and a pattern ends. This is the problem of BP and nothing else. Everything has a lifetime. And the two (??) player matrix discussed in the thread also has a lifetime.
Once again, as they like to discuss something invented, referring to theorists, game theories, operations research - these are all fine theories in a stationary world. If people take part in the stationary world, the world not only becomes nonstationary, but the uncertainty factor appears in the external conditions, as well as in the internal organization of decision-making. There are theories about it too, but they are different, but any attempts to apply stationarity together with Gauss to BP - it's flood in one mouth, in another to take a pause at a concert, that the audience wasn't bored, so they discuss the game with other players.
IMHO, of course.
Hello Nikolai ! A rare guest. :-)
What fell out after our long conversation ?
Hello Nikolai ! A rare guest. :-)
What fell out after our long conversation ?
>> Hey, Yuri!
Nothing concrete's come up yet. I'm thinking maybe I'd better... uh... a little bit of a frame job :)
>> it goes where it needs to go...
Did you mean "you're a fool" or is there an argument? If the latter, could you be more specific?
Did you mean "you're a fool" or is there an argument? If the latter, can you be more specific?
A wavelet is localised in time, unlike an FFT. Sorry, but that's the basics of wavelets, that's why they're used where PF fails