The forecasts should be treated more simply. Short-term ones are as important as possible, even long-term deals need to be supported. Long-term forecasts from fifty banks will be diametrically opposed and it's naive to think that Nirobka will predict your price better than those banks a year in advance. Now that's just child's play.
The forecasts should be treated more simply. Short-term ones are as important as possible, even long-term deals need to be supported. Long-term forecasts from fifty banks will be diametrically opposed and it's naive to think that Nirobka will predict your price better than those banks a year in advance. Now that's exactly child's play.
Glad to have a normal conversation.
As for the forecast horizon, I still consider the presence of an established (presumed) trend towards a certain target to be important. (And in intraday trading especially. You're not a martin-scalper, are you? I hope.)
As a rule, bulls and bears have different targets.
Very seldom anyone voices the real reasons for the retreat of one or the other.
"Market talk: the pound weakened after the publication of data on ..." - this is a statement of the time of the event. No more than that.
And Niroba is trying to build something. That's commendable.
And most importantly provoking others to do so!
I don't think he's an economist. And not a mathematician for sure.
But that doesn't stop him from thinking what he thinks about a subject he knows.
I, for one, can't say that about myself yet ;)
But trying to learn the subject and really, childishly happy to share his observations - is that a bad thing?
Oddly enough, Niroba's prophecies are coming true, but tightly. I am perplexed myself.
I said last week, when n4 and n1 hit the pivot zone, there will be a powerful move downwards, this version happened...
at that time the saturation on D1 and W1 had already reached its maximum...
I said last week that when the saturation on n4 and n1 entered the pivot zone there would be a powerful move downwards, this is what happened...
the saturation on D1 and W1 had already peaked...
that is - no one can prevent a fall and down?
if you read the forecasts, then who goes up?
so - no one can prevent a fall and down?
If you read the forecasts, everyone has a clause about a possible continuation of the move higher!
and when Niroba is asked for specifics
It is desirable to be specific.
But over a comparable period.
a month or two. a year.
Not a daytime one for sure.
Oddly enough, Niroba's Prophecies are coming true, albeit slowly. Perplexed myself.
You must be perplexed for life :) I haven't seen Niroba's 'Prophecies' come true. We will wait a long time for $12 oil :)))
>>When there are dozens of these prophecies, maybe one will come true and then you will carry him in your arms and satisfy him :)
And when Niroba is demanding specifics
It is advisable to be specific yourself.
But over a comparable period.
A month or two. A year.
>> not a day.
You must be perplexed for life :) I haven't seen Niroba's 'Prophecies' come true. We'll be waiting a long time for $12 oil :))).
When there are dozens of such predictions, maybe one will come true, then you will carry him in your arms and make him happy :)
Sidor, satisfy yourself.
I have not seen any of your predictions coming true in at least a year or two.
The forecasts should be treated more simply. Short-term ones are as important as possible, even long-term deals need to be supported. Long-term forecasts from fifty banks will be diametrically opposed and it's naive to think that Nirobka will predict your price better than those banks a year in advance. Now that's exactly child's play.
Glad to have a normal conversation.
As for the forecast horizon, I still consider the presence of an established (presumed) trend towards a certain target to be important. (And in intraday trading especially. You're not a martin-scalper, are you? I hope.)
As a rule, bulls and bears have different targets.
Very seldom anyone voices the real reasons for the retreat of one or the other.
"Market talk: the pound weakened after the publication of data on ..." - this is a statement of the time of the event. No more than that.
And Niroba is trying to build something. That's commendable.
And most importantly provoking others to do so!
I don't think he's an economist. And not a mathematician for sure.
But that doesn't stop him from thinking what he thinks about a subject he knows.
I, for one, can't say that about myself yet ;)
But trying to learn the subject and really, childishly happy to share his observations - is that a bad thing?
Glad to have a normal conversation.
I haven't seen any of your predictions come true in a year or two.
Did you get your head shaken at karate practice? I don't predict a year in advance. And your sydor proclivities, nirobka himself voiced them.
It's not "you", it's "plural". I thought I made myself clear, but I guess I didn't.
Then you, sir, are just self-satisfied here.
Is there any constructive? Or just pride, a la balloons, in your origins?