No more Locke's in MT5? [о_0] - page 3
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
PROGRAMMING OPTIONS ARE USELESS IF TRADING IS INITIALLY DONE WITH PROFITS IN ONE POCKET (DTS)
>> more info>> what can you prove?
I can't prove anything. He couldn't handle it, so he's freaking out.
Nothing. He couldn't get enough of it, so he's pissed off.
Wait, maybe Slava will be the first to show the "ignorant" how he makes money with locs, for example).
sllawa3 won't be able to post on the forum for a month.
Alas, he won't.)
sllawa3 will not be able to post in the forum for a month.
Does a ban in MQL4 forum mean an automatic ban in MQL5 forum?
Does a ban in MQL4 forum mean an automatic ban in MQL5 forum?
No
Wait, maybe Slava will be the first to show the "ignorant" how he makes money with locs, for example...)
Alas, he won't).
You can make money on lots, but they are crumbs from the table! For example, you open an islamic account (without swaps), open two orders with an equal lot in both directions, and wait for the 4 o'clock trand to change, close buy and go down and strip the money. But the thing is, if the trend turns around, you don't know where it will turn back, but you'll earn something minus the loss))). At the exit it is necessary to consider the angle of roll of the MA (the period from 100 and above), the MA line close to the horizontal does not mean that the trend has turned. So scrap all indicators except the MA (all induks based on the MA), a clean chart and lines, many lines starting from the daily periods.
You can make money on lots, but these are crumbs from the table! For example, you open an Islamic account (without swaps), open two orders with an equal lot in both directions,
If you do not want to read further, it's the same as not having an open position. I suggest LadyMambet review your school arithmetic and calculator skills.
>> Good luck.
>> what can you prove?
You don't need proof. Intuitively, the broker is interested in you having a position strictly in one direction, without using a high-lot loc in the opposite direction.
Proofs are not needed. Intuitively, the broker is interested in having a position strictly in one direction without using a loc with a big lot in the opposite direction.
That's the thing, those who are so in favour of the lock deflate "in three seconds" when you offer them an argument for their position. They start with "no need for proof", "intuitively understandable" ..... Nothing is clear: the market is a work with numbers, all statements can be checked using a calculator. If it's not obvious to you, perhaps you should ask yourself whether you are in the right business. Just say that it is more comfortable for you to trade - that will be true, only you do not realize that you earn not through the presence/absence of locs (this feature does not affect the possibility of earning), but through the availability of tactics to "break" them - and this is equivalent to the availability of a profitable trading system. And the statement that lock gives advantages is untrue. All the same is done WITHOUT locks. However, it's an old discussion - go to a parallel thread: there locists tried to prove with a calculator that there is no alternative to lock - it turned out that you need to remember arithmetic.
Good luck.
HZZ By the way, very often under the concept "earn" supporters loca understand the growth of balances. The impression is that they have never withdrawn money from a real account. If they had, they would have to know that the balance should be checked only in case there are no open positions, and if there are, the balance+equity amount.) So, if the trader closes a position and the balance increases, but the equity remains negative, it does not mean that he has earned ;).