"Trees don't grow to the sky" - page 21
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
This is an estimate, but not reality. If you look at the chart, it shows a wad that changes colour on reversals. Let's do the TS: when the colour changes, we enter and exit, we do not consider the reversal. We can see that at reversal to short on the 5-th section the wand is ideal: the reversal has practically coincided with the ZZ signal. On the reversal, there is quite a significant dip. Let's count: the reversal on the "0" candle. But we can know about the reversal on the -1 candle, or to be more precise, on Close[-1], i.e. we are on the -2 candle, i.e. we enter at Close[-2] at approximately 1.4120 instead of 1.5141. The same reasoning for closing the position: exit at about 1.3100 instead of 1.1869. The profit is 1020 pips, which is three times less than the theoretical one, but it is still a lot: about 1000% for one lot. Increasing the number of open lots, reinvesting the profit will increase your profit. You don't need to look at PAMM accounts. I think the calculation above is much more accurate than fairy tales and fantasies.
I agree. The theory is excellent. But how do you turn that theory into real practice?
It's not clear then, why with such great results without a real one? Only a tester?
И...?
И...?
Here's a test for August where each trade was fully in cash at the time of opening..:
A total of 45 trades
where is the time?