"Trees don't grow to the sky" - page 20

[Deleted]  
faa1947:

Let him indicate the interval at which this profit was made.
Specify ANY interval this year (no history of the past) I will run it with different settings... sorry, forgot to switch again...
[Deleted]  
Mischek:

pointless, Slava has been honing his fitting skills for several years, with a persistence that is baffling
and why exactly the fitting ? this Expert Advisor is quite resistant to different settings... ( as well as to dept size and lot size ... as long as the dept isn't smaller than minimum lot and the lot isn't larger than dept size ... ) )
[Deleted]  

Here's a test for August where each trade was fully in cash at the time of opening..:


Initial deposit 100.00
Net profit 9269.34
Total profit 10472.94
Total loss -1203.60
Profitability 8.70
Expected payoff 205.99
Absolute drawdown 3.00
Maximum drawdown 1290.40 (13.16%)
Relative drawdown 42.02% (391.06)
Total trades 45
Short positions (% win) 29 (72.41%)
Long positions (% win) 16 (75.00%)
Profitable trades (% of all) 33 (73.33%)
Loss trades (% of all) 12 (26.67%)
Largest
largest profitable trade 2421.98
losing trade -180.40
Average
317.36 profitable deal
losing trade -100.30
Maximum number
continuous wins (profit) 10 (8235.22)
Continuous Losses (Loss) 3 (-475.60)
Maximum
Continuous Profit (number of wins) 8235.22 (10)
Continuous loss (number of losses) -475.60 (3)
Average
continuous winnings 4
Continuous loss 2
[Deleted]  
The Expert Advisor is the simplest... on one wrist and price... The point is that stoploss is as low as possible ( loss-making ones are closed with min. losses) and profitable ones are spent...
Files:
 
sllawa3:
The Expert Advisor is the simplest... on a single swing arm and price... The point is that stoploss is as low as possible ( loss-making ones are closed with min. losses) and profitable ones are spent...
The tester can do better.
[Deleted]  
khorosh:
You can do better in the tester.
Why "make it" ! I just run it in the tester on the history... and as I said above with absolutely different settings... without any optimizations or adjustments...
[Deleted]  

here is the same test with constant minimum lot


Initial deposit 100.00
Net profit 18.30
Total profit 23.10
Total loss -4.80
Profitability 4.81
Expectation of winning 0.41
Absolute drawdown 0.10
Maximum drawdown 1.74 (1.59%)
Relative drawdown 1.59% (1.74)
Total trades 45
Short positions (% win) 29 (72.41%)
Long positions (% win) 16 (75.00%)
Profitable trades (% of all) 33 (73.33%)
Losses (% of all) 12 (26.
67%)
Largest
profitable trade 2.18
losing trade -0.40
Average
profitable trade 0.70
losing trade -0.40
Maximum
continuous wins (profit) 10 (7.85)
continuous losses (loss) 3 (-1.20)
Maximum
continuous gains (number of wins) 7.85 (10)
continuous losses (number of losses) -1.20 (3)
Average
continuous wins 4 xml-ph-0014@deepl.inte
 
sllawa3:
... ...with a wide variety of settings... without any optimisation or tweaking...
[Deleted]  
The only drawback of the Expert Advisor is a long wait for a trade ... sometimes a week may not happen ... or a week to go in the red (small because close stops do not allow much) but as seen in tests, the average statistical Expert Advisor is quite profitable ...
 
sllawa3:
the expert is the simplest... on one machine and the price...
Can you be a little more specific?