Who wants a strategy? Lots and for free) - page 46

 
Miroslav_Popov >> :

Taking into account that this is a MQL forum I want to recommend that you use the strategy generator of Mr. Reshetov. As I understand it generates ready to use strategies in MQL4. I admire him how fast he managed to start new project and to make it workable (actually I haven't tested it yet). Wish him success!

Thank you!


Only the rabbits multiply rapidly. I do not have too free time to fully engage in this project. I'm a trader, not a programmer.


 

Hello!


New version of Forex Strategy Builder v2.8.2.1 is ready.


  • Indicator logic rules description added to the Indicator Parameters Window.
  • Some tool windows resized to fit properly the Russian translation.
  • Parameter names of Hourly High Low indicator corrected.
  • Entry Hour indicator - minutes added.
  • Web links properly redirected.
 
zfs писал(а) >>

I for one don't like slack at all... what slack means...

Thank you! Nevertheless, there are also parameters such as number of trades, profitability, expected payoff.

This is how to choose the best strategy from the list:

Profit Deals Profitability Expected payoff Drawdown Drawdown %
470200 389 4.13 1208.74 44766 28.84%
469783 401 4.10 1171.53 44341 28.84%
420276 601 3.14 699.30 32736 22.89%
415921 643 2.87 646.85 31460 17.78%
389522 1263 2.38 308.41 32774 22.38%
385119 419 3.30 919.14 28338 15.13%
384733 2175 1.88 176.89 25117 19.85%
382045 1531 2.07 249.54 27509 17.35%
381936 1527 2.08 250.12 27984 17.35%
381203 2133 1.90 178.72 24840 19.84%
365660 2077 1.88 176.05 48301 27.54%
362222 1521 2.11 238.15 28101 25.38%
361162 859 2.31 420.45 27793 13.38%


Yuri Reshetov, your opinion is very interesting too.

 

where there is less drawdown and a higher expectation of return

this one's the best.

385119 419 3.30 919.14 28338 15.13%
 
keekkenen писал(а) >>

where there is less drawdown and a higher expectation of return

this one's the best.

385119 419 3.30 919.14 28338 15.13%

Thank you!

And this drawdown (reflected in the optimizer) is the maximal drawdown of the initial deposit, right?

However, I suppose the equity drawdown from some local highs may be so-so... :)

And if the expo starts working on the real account at such a moment...

Shouldn't the lot (in fact, the risk) be calculated on the basis of "such" maximum drawdowns?

In general, how to deal with the number of deals?

 
keekkenen >> :

where there is less drawdown and a higher expectation of return

this one's the best.

385119 419 3.30 919.14 28338 15.13%

Where there is less drawdown and more trades + more FS.

381203 2133 1.90 178.72 24840 19.84%
 
TheXpert >> :

Where there is less drawdown and more trades + more FS.

381203 2133 1.90 178.72 24840 19.84%

I don't agree with you...you have one transaction averaging 178 and my choice is 919 the difference is obvious...

 
keekkenen >> :

I don't agree with you... you have one transaction averaging 178 and my choice is 919... the difference is plain to see...

And I'm not asking you to agree with me. I gave my opinion. IOW is not the most important indicator.

 
TheXpert писал(а) >>

Where there is less drawdown and more trades + more FS.

381203 2133 1.90 178.72 24840 19.84%

Ok! But there is an opinion that the FV for real should be > 5/year.

And here, who is counting what?

 
Miroslav_Popov писал(а) >>

Found a mistake (from my point of view).

If "Market" - "Data period" is checked "Delete data before", but "Maximum number of bars" is enough to make the start period earlier than "Deleted" :), then ... (apparently the Min. of two values is taken). If "Maximum number of bars" is insufficient, then ... in short the parameter 'Delete data before' turns out to be useless.

'

Concerning 're-engineering' - yes, I got tired of inserting 'stubs' (SlotTypes/maMethod/IndicatorParam() etc.), and in an unfamiliar language, and with 'OOP' as well.

Reason: