Tester charts of future championship participants - page 7 1234567891011121314...32 New comment Alexander Bereznyak 2008.09.20 12:55 #61 USDJPY H1 1.5 19.07.08-19.09.08 Alexander Bereznyak 2008.09.20 12:57 #62 bvpbvp2008 писал (а) >> or better yet, take a period of the last championship and compete with Better :) It makes no sense, the market was different. Artem Kachalkov 2008.09.20 13:02 #63 Dima_S. писал (а) >> Here's my artwork :) Initial lot 1.2 I tried with starting lot 1.2 (01.01.08 - 20.08.08), but not as smooth as yours. TheXpert 2008.09.20 13:06 #64 sandex писал (а) >> It doesn't make sense, the market was different. No, to amuse the ego. sandex wrote (a) >> USDJPY H1 1.5 19.07.08-19.09.08 Not bad, i only have up to 40k... 7.20 -- 9.20 Галкин Сергей 2008.09.20 13:09 #65 Initial lot 0.5 Dima 2008.09.20 13:30 #66 SergeySDK писал (а) >> Initial lot 0.5 looks pretty good on the outside! are you using a neural network (judging by the name)? Dima 2008.09.20 13:36 #67 YuraZ писал (а) >> Considering that your test was done in 8-9 months, take any arbitrary plot and divide by 3 and you get roughly what it will be but not for sure. --- Take the worst point on the chart and start from it! it is better to test the strategy in this way! achieving stability when starting at any of the starting points during the interval of history about a year --- good points will be the luck In principle, correctly, this is one of the approaches to testing. I usually try to take parameters in the middle of a flat area during optimization, not necessarily corresponding to maximum profit. [Deleted] 2008.09.20 13:41 #68 0.1 Alexander Bereznyak 2008.09.20 13:41 #69 TheXpert писал (а) >> No, to amuse my ego. I did and I didn't get anything good. All last year the system was 3-4 times worse. Alexander Bereznyak 2008.09.20 13:44 #70 SergeySDK писал (а) >> Initial lot 0.5 I think the lot should have been set higher. 1234567891011121314...32 New comment
USDJPY H1 1.5 19.07.08-19.09.08
or better yet, take a period of the last championship and compete with Better :)
It makes no sense, the market was different.
Here's my artwork :)
Initial lot 1.2
I tried with starting lot 1.2 (01.01.08 - 20.08.08), but not as smooth as yours.
It doesn't make sense, the market was different.
No, to amuse the ego.
USDJPY H1 1.5 19.07.08-19.09.08
Not bad, i only have up to 40k...
7.20 -- 9.20
Initial lot 0.5
Initial lot 0.5
looks pretty good on the outside! are you using a neural network (judging by the name)?
Considering that your test was done in 8-9 months, take any arbitrary plot and divide by 3 and you get roughly what it will be
but not for sure.
---
Take the worst point on the chart and start from it!
it is better to test the strategy in this way!
achieving stability when starting at any of the starting points during the interval of history about a year
---
good points will be the luck
In principle, correctly, this is one of the approaches to testing.
I usually try to take parameters in the middle of a flat area during optimization, not necessarily corresponding to maximum profit.

0.1No, to amuse my ego.
I did and I didn't get anything good.
All last year the system was 3-4 times worse.
Initial lot 0.5
I think the lot should have been set higher.