A great book on testing and optimisation - page 19

 
FOXXXi писал(а) >>

Now apologize to me for the shit you posted here. That's not the way heroes do things, I told you everything will be cleared up.

What bullshit?

 
FOXXXi писал(а) >>

But no, even if you make money with this method, you'll still write here that it's crap. No, not for fun, I use it in trading.

I don't think it's funny, I use it in trading. it's impossible to use 1 method in trade. there is no grail, and you set your cointegration to an unrealistically high level. as i understand you trade in stocks. you probably have not seen defaults while trading. well, never mind experience is son of mistakes. in forex the method is foreign to everyone because there are crosses. you should say right away that you trade only in stocks.

As for the comments, I would apologize if I were you, you behave like a child, even if you're over 40 I'm not surprised. Secondly, do not pour over the others.

 
LeoV >> :

>> what the fuck?

You've shown your true face. I kept it as a souvenir, I can put it out there if you want, so no apology, right?

 
FOXXXi писал(а) >>

So you showed your true face. I kept it as a souvenir, if you want, I can put it back in the public eye, so there will be no apology, I take it?

What apology? I didn't call you stupid, stupid, idiot, clinically ill, bullshit, and I didn't offer to knock it on your forehead, unlike you -

FOXXXi wrote(a) >>...... you're killing your stupidity....... for ardent dullards...... all sorts of bullshit..... you sure are an idiot, you position yourself that way, and knock that phrase on your forehead.....
FOXXXi wrote(a) >> Out-of-sample, forward and other bullshit is clinical.

Will there be an apology from you for these direct insults?

 
LeoV >> :

My position is one - no reala? - No. Just words and screens? - Yes. Then "go away, Vasya!" ....))))

Leonid, not in defense of FOXXXi, but to make things clearer, I will explain:

- As for the brokers, they do not give the investment-passwords to accounts, at least none of mine do and I have not heard from my colleagues who gave them to others.

- I have seen monitoring only for MTs, stockbrokers do not support monitoring.

- >> Stockbrokers have PAMM/LAMM accounts, but they (bourgeois) have prohibited by law the advertising of investment activities. I.e. there are PAMM accounts,

But there is no rating and you cannot advertise your PAMM publicly; information is given by word of mouth,

- I have never seen a balance/equity chart before.

.

So if someone from trading on the exchange and wants to surprise you miracle-real, then there are only 2 ways:

- give the login/password from the account, which you can not only watch, but also trade (a sane person will not go for this),

- post the state which you cannot trust.

.

The conclusions are obvious.

 
goldtrader писал(а) >>

Leonid, not in FOXXXi's defence, but just to clarify:

I understand. But then you don't have to yell that you're the smartest. You wrote yourself.

goldtrader wrote >>

He who knows, he keeps silent, he who speaks does not know. (Lao Tzu)

Absolutely agree with you......)))))
 
LeoV >> :

What apology? I didn't call you stupid, dumb, idiot, clinically ill, bullshit, and I didn't offer to knock it on your forehead, unlike you -

You gonna apologize for those direct insults?

You dodged a bullet.

First it was not in your address - that's one.He deserves it, because he makes himself look so.First he says that I can not use any of the models, then contradicts himself and allegedly does not understand what it's about and makes me look like an idiot, you did the same and even worse.Nobody refuted a single word I said, it is not even about TC, and in general, my words are confirmed, that you can easily see in the sequence of posts.

As for out-of-sample,forward - what,is it wrong again?

You're getting sidetracked again.

 
FOXXXi писал(а) >>

First of all it was not addressed to you - that's one.He deserves it because he makes himself look like that.First he says that I do not know how to use any of the models,then he contradicts himself and allegedly does not understand what he is talking about and makes me look like an idiot.You did the same and even worse.Nobody has refuted a single word I said,this is not even about TC,but in general,my words are confirmed,which you can easily see from the sequence of posts.

I don't know who you are - there's no data about you other than your nickname FOXXXi. I don't know whether you are a real trader or not - I don't know and there is no confirmation of that. And the one you called so - my comrade, who really trades and sums that you have never dreamed of. Therefore, you have no right to call someone you do not know by those words - he did not call you that. It's not cultural, to say the least.

FOXXXi wrote(a) >> About the out-of-sample,forward - what,wrong again? Did the TA work again?

You're getting sidetracked again.

I have no desire to argue with you on this subject. I didn't start this argument - you did. Give me something more concrete and real, instead of your hysterical rants - then I'll see whether or not I want to argue with you.
 
FOXXXi писал(а) >> dodged it.

And he didn't dodge it, he wrote the plain truth....))))

 
LeoV >> :

I understand. But then you don't have to shout that you're the smartest.

On the contrary, I wrote that there are a lot of people who know, but they are stupid, which is confirmed, or again not so?