Why anyone who sells signals withdraws - page 4

 
Alexandr Saprykin:

So no one is stopping you from choosing a normal signal to subscribe to. Or do you see rip-offs everywhere?

This has nothing to do with ripping off anyone who is against subscribing to an honest-to-goodness signal for a percentage of $20 or $100, and this is the point.
 
The principle of percentage calculation is clear, we start to trade with 1000 dollars and from this one thousand dollars interest varies, for example, went into a deep drawdown and fraction of 5000 dollars, came out of drawdown received a profit and it smeared already on 6000 dollars. Everything is fair. But we may do it this way. Just before the closing of the drawdown, when we see that it is about to close in profit, we withdraw $ 5000 and the resulting profits will be distributed by $ 1000, that is, in percentage terms they will be much higher. Hence the sharp increase of profit percentage. In this case, it is cheating and we have to look at the history. Potential subscriber should have a brain and study not only the vertical rise of the profit curve in percentage, but also the history of transactions (drawdowns, etc.) benefit it is all available in the description and characteristics of the signal.
 
The monitoring of accounts that withdraw profits should be banned to prevent cheating. It would not be difficult for providers to open another account without withdrawal purely for show.
 
Ramil Sungatov:
The monitoring of accounts that withdraw profits should be banned to prevent cheating. It would not be difficult for providers to open another account without withdrawal purely for show.
Doesn't the trader need to eat? Let him not withdraw his profit and stay hungry?
 
Ramil Sungatov:
The monitoring of accounts that withdraw profits should be banned to prevent cheating. It would not be difficult for providers to open another account without withdrawals purely for show.
And if a person has been using the account for many years for daily needs and monitored it in the signals? The subscriber should decide for himself whether to sign up or not.
 
Ramil Sungatov:
The monitoring of accounts that withdraw profits should be banned to prevent cheating. It would not be difficult for providers to open another account without withdrawal purely for show.
If you do not withdraw dough, the account will grow, so subscribers should keep the same amount of money in their accounts if not more, and not withdraw the same dough. Isn't it true? Or you have not thought about it?
 
Avtosamobranka:
If you do not withdraw money, your account will grow, so subscribers have to keep the same amount of money in their accounts, if not more, and not withdraw the same amount of money. Isn't it true? Or you have not thought about it?
It is true what they say.)
 
In my opinion, it is sufficient to simply make the rule "withdrawals are only allowed when all positions are closed, failure to comply with the rule leads to disconnection from the signal broadcast".
 
-Aleks-:
In my opinion, simply make a rule "withdrawal is allowed only when all positions are closed, non-compliance with the rule leads to disconnection from the signal broadcast".

in some cases it is never :-))) With a huge amount of trades per day, it is very hard to stop all trading and will lead to loss of earnings. Subscription is voluntary, like the signal, study the history and subscribe.

 
Ruslan Polyn:

in some cases it is never :-))) With a huge amount of trades per day, it is very hard to stop all trading and will lead to loss of earnings. Subscription is voluntary, like the signal, learn the story and subscribe.

Yes, I know it can be hard to stop trading, but it is possible to do it once a month or a quarter.
Reason: