Karputov Vladimir: Any attempts to use decompiled code are punished and after the first ban everyone suddenly becomes very aware that decompiled code is forbidden.
it will not prohibit them from working outside the service.
the rules do not state that putting up a response post constitutes consent for the performer to do the work.
What is the ban for? for decompiling work? so they didn't work.
for agreeing to do work with decompiled? so one only agreed to do the actual work (made an agreement to work).
ZS: you need to re-ban a good part of the users, or better yet, look at the ip who saw the decompile on that page and ban them too, because they saw the decompile.
Karputov Vladimir: Any attempts to use decompiled code are punished and after the first ban everyone suddenly becomes very aware that decompiled code is forbidden.
read the rules:
It is forbidden to execute and submit through the Freelance service Orders related to violation of the law (decompiling, creating malware or spyware, etc.).
They did not, only one did. As a matter of fact.
You cannot place an order and fulfill it. Not just put up a response.
Karputov Vladimir: Trying to find an excuse, nothing more.
Do you think that the rules were invented only to punish?) They are also there to defend themselves)). And if you defend yourself on the basis of the rules, there is no excuse.
azfaraon: Do you think that rules were invented only to punish?) They are also for defending oneself))) And if you defend yourself based on the rules, it does not smell like an excuse ...
Yes, it turns out the rules are only for moderators, when you give evidence based on the rules, this evidence is called "excuses".
Any attempts to use decompiled code are punished and after the first ban everyone suddenly becomes very aware that decompiled code is forbidden.
the rules do not state that putting up a response post constitutes consent for the performer to do the work.
What is the ban for? for decompiling work? so they didn't work.
for agreeing to do work with decompiled? so one only agreed to do the actual work (made an agreement to work).
ZS: you need to re-ban a good part of the users, or better yet, look at the ip who saw the decompile on that page and ban them too, because they saw the decompile.
A question for the administration. Moderators can't do anything in freelance
Any attempts to use decompiled code are punished and after the first ban everyone suddenly becomes very aware that decompiled code is forbidden.
read the rules:
They did not, only one did. As a matter of fact.
You cannot place an order and fulfill it. Not just put up a response.
read the rules:
they didn't, only one did. The fact is.
You can't put in an order and execute it. Not just put up a response.
Trying to find an excuse, nothing more.
Trying to find an excuse, nothing more.
Do you think that rules were invented only to punish?) They are also for defending oneself))) And if you defend yourself based on the rules, it does not smell like an excuse ...