How can I tell if I have decompiled or not?

[Alexandr Bryzgalov]

Is there some kind of algorithm?

or can any code that contains variables of type fall under decompiled code?

 double ld_52;

   double ld_60;

   double ld_68;

   double ld_76;

   double ld_84;

   double ld_92;

   double ld_100;

   double lda_108[1000];

[Alexandr Bryzgalov]

Very interesting to hear the opinions of those who have been in programming for a long time and know the subject from the ground up.

[Alexandr Bryzgalov]

For example, how is decompiling from other programming languages defined?

[Vitaly Muzichenko]

Alexandr Bryzgalov:

For example how is decompiled from other programming languages defined?

This is explicitly decompiled code.

At the programming level, with this variable definition you won't know what it means at line 20 of the code. Variables are usually written in a more sensible form and make it clear what they mean when reading them on line 300.

I saw someone else's code where the variable of position opening was called "Tral". But if we use trailing stop in this code, what should we call it?

There are some variables that almost everyone uses without exception, it's "Slippage", and when you look at the code it's already clear to everyone what it means, so it's easy to work with code on even 4000 lines if the variables are properly described.

[Victor Nikolaev]

Alexandr Bryzgalov:

For example, how is decompiling defined from other programming languages?

What is the reason for such interest in decompilation?

It seems to have been prompted by this work.

A piece of code from it is simple.

The customer and all the executors are in the ban

[Server Muradasilov]

Victor Nikolaev:

What is this interest in decompiling related to?

It seems to have been prompted by this work.

A piece of code from it is simple.

The client and all the executors are in the tank.

Greetings

It's the first time I've seen such a mass ban on a resource

[Victor Nikolaev]

Server Muradasilov:

Greetings

It's the first time I've seen such a mass bath on the site.

There have been before. No one has raised the issue much.

Maybe the community should have been made aware of it earlier. It wouldn't be like this now

[Victor Nikolaev]

azfaraon:
I am like a outsider ... To be honest I do not quite understand the ban policy in this case ... Why ban a person, and not create a program that it could not be opened ... It's like the customs let through some goods, and the user of this product is responsible ...

Are you not a fence?

[[Deleted]]

Victor Nikolaev:
You wouldn't happen to be a fence, would you?

You should be banned for saying that...))) - Never mind ... I see there's no point in having a dialogue ... Good luck ...

[Dmitry Fedoseev]

Now that's a total ban.

About the code. There is a certain Taras Bulba on the fourth forum, his code was not accepted into the code base because he named variables in the same style as the decompilers.

[Дмитрий Ушаков]

By the way, this thread would not exist if the decompiled code itself were removed.

It turns out that anyone can go in, download and edit - use it.

Who did not delete that one too for aiding and abetting, for further distribution. ))))

All who came to see the application will clap their hands.

And will say, "I can download it and use decompile." ))))))))))))))