
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
why the 4th forum? -- he's here now -- both in marketplace and freelance.
Here's an example of his code in the codebase https://www.mql5.com/ru/code/9835
Kim wrote in all his functions:
But if you look at the "doer" code, Kim's copyright is rubbed out there.
Where are the human rights speakers here?
That's where the copyright is really being violated.
The functions in that template were taken directly from Igor. The only thing he did was to change the name and remove Igor's copyright in the header. At the same time, instead of Igor's copyright I blatantly inserted my own:
A clear misappropriation of someone else's merits and a violation of Igor's authorship by substituting his own.
The functions in that template were taken cleanly from Igor. I only changed the name and removed Igor's copyright in the header. Igor's copyright is replaced by his own:
Unambiguous misappropriation of someone else's credit and infringement of Igor's authorship by substituting authorship for oneself.
I wonder why IC does not remove his code from the codebase?
Because the copyright infringement is obvious and easy to check. Kim's code is in the public domain.
Why aren't issues of such copyright infringement raised?
Here are the Terms of Use https://www.mql5.com/ru/about/terms:
3.9. You agree not to reproduce, copy, sell, trade or resell the content of www.mql5.com. The only exception is if a separate agreement with MQL5 Ltd allows otherwise. If you make copies of any Content, all copyright and other proprietary notices contained in the original materials must be retained on such copies. You may not modify the Content or publicly display, reproduce or distribute it. The mql5.com website is owned by MQL5 Ltd. MQL5 Ltd websites are protected by international copyright laws. Any unauthorized use of MQL5 Ltd Websites may violate copyright, trademark and other laws.
Igor's function SetOrder()
The function of a gentleman appropriating someone else's things:
And tell me he didn't assign it because he changed a couple of lines...
I can provide as many examples of misappropriation of Igor's work as I want.
Igor's function SetOrder()
The function of the misappropriator:
And tell me he didn't assign it because he changed a couple of lines...
Well, you're wrong -- in Kim's it says "set order" -- and in hisit says "set pending order" -- do you feel the difference?
No, well, you're wrong -- Kim's says "set order" -- and hissays "set pending order" -- do you feel the difference? Don't you notice the invaluable contribution to Kim's code?
By the way, Kim's code doesn't just have the copyright removed, it has an addition of his own authorship:
If you look at his code in the codebase, the override of Kim's authorship to his own authorship is present in every Kim function.
For example https://www.mql5.com/ru/code/9835 .
Question for a quiz: what is copyright?
1
//| Copyright 2015, Urain |
2
The first or the second? Or both?
By the way, Kim's code doesn't just have the copyright removed, it has an addition of his own authorship:
If you look at his code in the codebase, the override of Kim's authorship to his own authorship is present in every Kim function.
For example https://www.mql5.com/ru/code/9835 .
What makes you think I don't know? I don't take part in freelance services but sometimes I do write code to order. This is an example of an unconsidered accusation)))
I haven't, but I can't know for sure. I've seen codes from good friends of mine passed off as theirs, changing the header in the source code, and leaving the rest of the code "as is". It was even discussed in our forum. On the fourth forum, one person on the fourth forum misrepresented Igor Kim's code as his own. Insolently and unceremoniously. Source code. This is despicable, vile and low.
That's one of the fundamental points - you don't know the cuisine, but you're trying to become a chef.
Don't think I'm for decompiles - no, I'm definitely against it. But you have to look at the circumstances. Either you think anyone who offers you code is a thief, or you think before you accuse.
No, I can't. But you can't prove that a customer makes money by breaking someone else's code either. Or has the presumption of innocence been abolished? So you'd better prove guilt first.
Otherwise I will show you code that looks like decompiled - you will become a thief because you saw this code.
I'm against any kind of decompiling in any form, once again I'm surprised at the number of programmers who don't shy away from getting their asses dirty for a penny.
What is there to prove? The fact is on the face of decompiling in the studio, and not knowing the rules does not exempt from liability.
Question for a quiz: What is copyright?
1
2
The first or the second? Or both?
What do you think?
For example, authorship?