The agony of choice - page 4
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
It's the kind of enthusiastic new programmers you can't uproot from freelancing later on.)
much credit to the administration
You are a practitioner, not a teacher.
I understand that you are trying to draw false conclusions from the right assumptions.
why can't a practitioner be a teacher?
Why can't a teacher have practice in the subject he or she teaches?
why must he who programs be a programmer?
no sane teacher would ever advise a beginner who wants to write expert advisors and indicators in mcl4/5 -- first to learn c++, and then to learn mcl4/5 -- it's like that in "beginners Windows" course to start with MS-DOS commands
p.s. Everything is good in moderation and should always be fit for purpose
Well, here you go:
A long time ago, back in the days of the old builds... I had the pleasure of seeing such a funny picture on my monitor:
Whether long or short - the developers decided to release a new "improved" build. And the developers forgot about backwards compatibility of old software versions. And here's the problem - they stopped drawing funny pictures on my monitor... Everything started to look much sadder:
What was left of the goat, as they say...
by the way, no sane teacher would ever advise a beginner who wants to write expert advisors and indicators in mcl4/5 to learn c++ first, and then learn mcl4/5 -- it's like learning MS-DOS commands in "beginners Windows for beginners" course
There you go:
Show me the code
Maybe it's not the same code, just the name of the indicator strangely matches the names of screens, but here is a clear example where an array of int type is declared which is passed to a user function, and there the datetime type is accepted
Well and a bunch of warnings about re-declaration of variables and variables not used.
Well, here you go:
A long time ago, back in the days of the old builds... I had the pleasure of seeing such a funny picture on my monitor:
Whether long or short - the developers decided to release a new "improved" build. And the developers forgot about backwards compatibility of old software versions. And here's the problem - they stopped drawing funny pictures on my monitor... Everything started to look much sadder:
What was left of the goat, as they say...
There's no doubt MT5 is a head above MT4, even a few.
There is a good tester in MT5, but there is no deep quotes history from 10 years and above.
And how can I convince my broker to download them? Otkritie seems to have several years of FORTS on MT5, but there is no correct quotation history for glued futures. Even if the history is complete, it is not certain that it will be correct. Always used to trust only myself. Not to mention forex. There is one brokerage company in MT5 with a lot of different quotes, but damn, the history is a couple of years old and that's it.... And brokerage companies seem to be reliable, but before starting to trade they need to check their bots. I mean the same, right? It's so time consuming to create a trading robot on two or three years of history.
Is it so labour-intensive to make it possible to create your own symbol in MT5 and then load your own history there? You can test a strategy on "your own symbols" and then run bots on DC symbols.
TradeStation write on their website that they give their clients 27 years of intraday history!!! The daily totals are more.