Billy, where's my money, or How to write a New Year's Miracle in a couple of hours - page 8
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
You won't burn yourself out on spreads?)
It's not hope, it's suicide.... Enough of how much money I lost and for the tester....
PS, Still waiting for MK, to become a normal firm, in a normal country, with an auditor, what, to drag them through the courts...
At any moment ready to prove that, the same advisor, in the same period... ... will go up in the tester, and vice versa in the real account. In MT5 the quality of modelling is like 100%, it is not even within 10%.
MK, Where are you? Let's talk.... I'm gonna crush you crooks.... What do you want to bet? On what I lost in real money and your tester.... No more than that.
Not true, when it comes to the tester on the MT5 platform it's better than anything else. The only drawback is the lack of tick history, so you have to put up with minutes and tick generation. For pipsers there is not much of a fish here. You won't get patterns related to spreads widening and tick patterns. In other respects it is a breakthrough compared to 4.
And for them any tester is evil - as soon as it comes to the numbers in the acho, their brains shut down. From that moment on, they work on the tester and not on the implementation of the idea - with the help of a bot, they try to tune it to the correct acho numbers. 2/3 don't check where this number comes from and whether the bot works according to the planned algorithm. Usually the affair starts frantically scrambling around looking for a "filter" and is usually an accurate symptom - the brain has wandered away from the shores, the original idea is a dud. In my imho only 10% especially stubborn still get to the analysis, why a properly implemented idea earns and under what conditions begins to drain
We cannot be sure it is the tester and the bespectacled ones who are guilty of causing trader's problems. And why not just ignore the tester and trade on your idea with your hands? And why haven't I ever seen one of these
:-) naive, praise is better, but the practical benefits ... just a little, only for small programmers and for traders it's all a scam
Personally, I always put the system live for a month after testing, then put that month to the test, if everything matches, the system goes to work.
If the trader cannot test the system and makes a primitive fitting using hundreds of parameters and then wonders why it starts to fail in real life I cannot help them)
I see a system without parameters, everything should be fine-tuned to the current market, but it's an ideal to strive for.)