I have been charged, where do I find out what for? - page 38

You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
no, more like a detective.... find out who's to blame...
It's called trolling. You don't have to go into small details. The question on the agenda is "what am I (you, him, her, them, all of them) like as a doer and seller? А? Only honestly? Are all saints angels?
What about you? I haven't had an answer for myself yet.
I kind of hinted at it. Not about myself, but about my impressions of my surroundings.
I got it. I'm over it.
I mean, it's a good idea for everyone to clean up their own act first. Personally, I try to act the way I want to be treated.
Personally, I try to act the way I want to be treated.
It's called trolling. You don't have to go into small details. The question on the agenda is "what am I (you, him, her, them, all of them) like as a doer and a salesman? А? Only honestly? Are all saints angels?
I don't know what role I'm in. Are we going to role-play now?
The party applying for arbitration shall pay the costs of the arbitration (in life - the state fee, here - 5%). The court may impose the costs of the arbitration (5%) on the guilty party. If the Arbitral Tribunal finds in favour of the Respondent, the 5% is already paid by the Claimant. If the Award is in favour of the Claimant, then the Respondent shall reimburse the Claimant's costs (5%). In either case, this Arbitration will be paid (which Renat is so happy about) and the guilty party (client or contractor) will be financially punished.
The introduction of a fee when applying to arbitration will hopefully reduce the number of appeals.
I am on the side of the customer in these proceedings.
Let's forget about it for a long time.
Now philosophical issues are being raised
Where is the "gone"? Again the customer must always pay (see point 6 of the new rules)
IV. Procedure of payment for work
Let's give the current Rules here, the order fulfilment procedure itself will be improved - we will make it more clear and user friendly, tips will be added and the interface will be improved. Other changes for the better are also possible, and the service will continue to develop.
6. When applying to arbitration, a fee of 5% of the amount blocked on the Customer's account for the work in question will be withheld irrespective of whose favor the award is made. Cancellation in favour of the Employer shall not waive the fee.
V. Procedure for processing of appeals to the Arbitration
6. The Arbitration can make one of three decisions:
2. to cancel the job in favour of the Customer - 5% of the blocked amount is deducted from the Customer's account and the remaining 95% is released; nothing is added to the Provider's account and the service fee is 5%. The work returns to the category "New" and is available for choosing a new Provider. Only the Customer can leave feedback on the work.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dear Administrators! Well, you know that these two points (IV.6 and V.6.2) are not only unfair, but absurd in nature? And that's why I propose to write them down as follows:
IV. Procedure for remuneration
6. When applying to the Arbitration a fee in the amount of 5% of the amount of the work in accordance with clause V.6 of the Rules (see below) will be charged.
V. The procedure of the review of the appeals to the Arbitration
6. the Arbitration can make one of three decisions
2. tocancel the work in favour of the Customer - 5% from the account of the Contractor shall be deducted from the amount of the work. The Provider is obliged to pay the missing funds to the Customer's account if there are no funds on the account; failure to do so will result in the Provider's blocking in the Job service with a downgrade and a fine of an additional 5% of the amount of the completed job. 100% of the funds blocked on the Customer's account are released. The job
returns to the "New" category and is available for the selection of a new Contractor; only the Customer can leave feedback on the job.
There are no objections to the other clauses of the Rules - everything is logical and fair.