I have been charged, where do I find out what for? - page 34

[Armen]

kylinar2012

misquoting.

before, there was nothing at all in the job about penalties and the commission was 5%

[Armen]

Integer:
Nah. For that kind of money, it's bullshit. Just killing on the spot.

For what? To rewrite from 4 to 5?

[Dmitry Fedoseev]

Armen:
What was that for? To rewrite from 4 to 5?

What kind of question is that? Have you already forgotten what the conversation is about? What's a 4, what's a 5? What are you talking about?

[Valeriy Korobeynik]

Before, they didn't take a commission either, all for a thank you...

[kylinar2012]

Armen:

kylinar2012

misquoting.

before there was nothing at all in the job about penalties and the commission was 5%

I got it from a search engine, from here:

Achieved cached page for https://www.mql5.com/ru/job/rules

Below is a snapshot of the web page displayed on 02.12.2013 (when last visited by the crawler). This is the version of the page that was used to evaluate the search results.

[Armen]

Integer:
What was the question? Have you already forgotten what we're talking about? What's for 4, what's for 5? What are you talking about?

you must have forgotten? what was not feasible in the development assignment?

[Dmitry Fedoseev]

Armen:
you must have forgotten that? what was not feasible in the development assignment?

...another one...

[Anatoli Kazharski]

Yoschik:

The discussion has entered the final stage - "Long live the Court" ))

So it's coming to an end.

It's a "pile of small". You just stay out of it, or you'll be crushed and crushed yourself. )))

[Yoschik]

tol64:
It's a pile of malarkey. Just stay out of it, or you and yourselves will be crushed. )))

I'm staying out of it. The issue is closed. At least it's better than it was. Fairer.

They'll throw lawyers and lawyers at each other for another dozen pages before they settle down.

Another interesting thing that hasn't happened in all these pages, until the last moment.

There was no Roche.

[Alexandr Bryzgalov]

Integer:

If I were the arbitrator, I would take all the money and not give it back. Because the assignment is a mockery - unworkable. The assignment is impossible to do, so it is possible not to do it, to take the money and not give anything back. How can you give back something that can't be done?

You are making a good point:

1. you read the job, said you would do it.

2. you give a price, take an advance payment.

3. refused the job and a refund because he realised that the task can not be done.

SZS: If so, after reviewing the job or put a normal price (one for which it will not be too lazy to work), or to refuse.