Debugging the DLL? In MT4 and MT5 - page 8
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Don't engage in provocation on our forum. You have been warned.
Let's see how long it takes you to do it. No need for any surveys, do it, show your class.
You have correctly written that in spite of experience you have made many mistakes... So any current decision is not another mistake ;-). And MQ is not the only one who is engaged in practical software development... And to prove one's professionalism in this area is not very convincing...
We will make many tactical mistakes yet, but our strategic direction has settled - the accumulated experience of working in one direction has had an effect. I have already written about the competitors - they are quite weak-willed.
Also, you forgot to quote an important part:
I have to explain in this way, because I am not going to lecture on how to create information and trading platforms, what is important in this, where the fatal failures are and where success is.
I'm not a hacker. I don't intend to be. Your offer is inappropriate.
And giving out advice and making predictions about things you don't understand is appropriate?!
I get the impression that lockers have been rebranded as defenders of external debugging. :)
...The best thing would really be to make decisions based on open user voting ...
Of course you don't have to. The question is why exactly this is something you don't have to and something else you do ;-). The best thing would really be to make decisions based on open user voting, so that everyone can see who needs what functionality and features, and how many such people there are. As long as MQ makes decisions in closed mode and only mentions hypothetical advocates of this or that feature - the validity of decisions is not seen.
As a matter of fact, it has already been said many times - no matter how hard MQ tries, it will never be able to create a professional development tool comparable to the real development environments available on the market (you may disagree, but it's a given and your position doesn't change the situation). That's why DLL development would be in demand, and so would debugging. Debugging in some self-written emulator is hardly equal to debugging in a real host application, plus all the costs of its writing are passed on to the user. In this sense, for someone it would be more convenient (how many of them we'll probably never know ;-)) not to have MQL layer, and MQ provide some client API which is available "directly" for integration with external programs.
You wrote correctly that in spite of experience you made a lot of mistakes... So any current decision is not another mistake ;-). And MQ is not the only one who is engaged in practical software development... And to prove one's professionalism in this field is not very convincing...
Of course they do, and they acknowledge them - the debugging bug that allowed to create the decompiler for ex4 was acknowledged (and corrected).
And what do you suggest - to step on a rake again?
PS
It's not only MQ, Forex Club does it too. They even have an API (not just for trading). So, all have to switch to R2?
By the way,
и,