Machine learning in trading: theory, models, practice and algo-trading - page 973
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
So it's not julia.h but julia.mqh :)
Directly unlikely, imho. More likely a DLL wrapper has to be created. MQL is not like C++, they are not interchangeable.
I don't think so, imho. More likely a DLL wrapper has to be created. MQL is not like C++, they are not interchangeable.
I'm leaving now, because I'm not able to do it :)
That's where I take my leave and go into the shadows, because I don't know how :)
I can't guarantee yet that I will do Julia, but I will look at her for sure).
I don't guarantee that I'll do Julia yet, but I'll take a closer look at it for sure).
The best way is to write entirely in Python or Julia, and the terminal will just trade
I don't have good tester, but if I will not use hft it will not be crucial. But later it will be easier to connect to other exchanges, when all mt5 brokers will buy my grail
The best way is to write entirely in Python or Julia, and the terminal will just trade
Of course, I won't have a good tester, but if it's not hft then it's not critical. But then it's easier to connect to other exchanges, when all mt5 brokers will buy my grail
Yep, everyone has to do his own job. The terminal - to trade, and the trader should make programs and use what he wants, not what he is given.
It seems that about half a year ago we were already talking about it).
I am sticking to this ideology since 2008. And I haven't cared which terminal for a long time. No preference.) And the speed in any terminal is enough - for scalping (by the cup and the strip) is enough with reserve, we are not dealing with HFT.)
As for the tester - it's just a cycle. It has a very small addition to the system, and the ticks can be removed.) If it is necessary.
By the way, there are testers for python with visualization and built-in example strategies
For Julia it seems that no
By the way, there are testers for python with visualization and built-in example strategies
Well, I haven't really worked with Python. I mean with modules - I haven't got the task for it yet. So far, everything is solved by the old tried and tested tools.
SZ Julia's packages - well, the most part of them are untested, and even non-working.( XGBoost Julia's package, by the way, is non-working, and that one is 2 years old. In general, judging by the dates, she, Julia, no one systematically engaged.
Totally agree, that's why I stopped participating in that contest half a year ago :(
But now they finally did what they promised back in 2017 - reputation-based payouts. In the sliding window for the last 20 tournaments give a point for each live<0.693. The number of points is reputation, max=20. Current record in my opinion = 9. Participants with the highest reputation will be paid prize money even without stacking.
In short - those who know how to do forex - they have somehow learned how to make stable models, where the emphasis is not on 100% accuracy, but on the fact that in the future the model worked no worse than on trader. And now this knowledge can be monetized there.
Someone wants Python, so he uses any means to push his desire, passing it off as some kind of truth.
There are several ratings of programming languages, here in my blog I have twice cited such ratings.
Here's another one, one of the most authoritative TIOBE
Unlike the rating of R, in the rating of Python you need to understand a few nuances:
Not for discussion
https://www.kdnuggets.com/2018/05/poll-tools-analytics-data-science-machine-learning-results.html