Machine learning in trading: theory, models, practice and algo-trading - page 2301
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
There are signs that, oddly enough, worsen the generalizing ability (I speak for catbust in particular, probably applies to others). It would seem strange, because you just add new signs, and the model gives an error more than it was without them
For example, trained on several machines, then removed a few and the accuracy became higher
No, one layer is primitive, it's just one weight multiplication
That's your theory.
not mine.
There are signs that, oddly enough, worsen the generalizing ability (I speak for catbust in particular, probably applies to others). It would seem strange, because you just add new signs, and the model gives an error more than it was without them
For example, I trained on several machines, then I removed some of them and it became higher
I described this effect long time ago
https://www.mql5.com/ru/blogs/post/725189
Detected by completely retraining the model.
It is noise - which prevents you from working.
I described this effect a long time ago
https://www.mql5.com/ru/blogs/post/725189
Detected by a complete retraining of the model.
It is the noise - which interferes with the work.
Yes, but here you can see how the features interact. Too bad it's tied to a specific MO framework
because the importance can be underestimated by multicollinearity
Of course, manually fiddling when there are a lot of signs is not comelfoNo, one layer is primitive, it's just one weight multiplication
That's your theory.
Here I found it - Tsybenko's theorem.
The presented formula y = x1/x2. - is continuous and only two-dimensional.
https://www.mql5.com/ru/code/9002
Recommendations:
The presented formula y = x1/x2. - is continuous and only two-dimensional.
Is it discrete or continuous?
Is it discrete or continuous?
It's continuous. Does it have gaps and holes? Did you look at the picture with the examples?
Continuous. Does it have gaps and holes? Did you look at the picture with the examples?
Yes....
A continuous function is afunction that changes without instantaneous "jumps" (calledgaps), that is, one whose small changes inthe argument result in small changes in the value of the function.The graph of a continuous function is a continuousline.
Yes....
A continuous function is afunction that changes without instantaneous "jumps" (calleddiscontinuities), that is, one whose small changes in the argument result in small changes in the value of the function.The graph of a continuous function is a continuousline.
At what point isy = x1/x2 interrupted?
x2=0