Machine learning in trading: theory, models, practice and algo-trading - page 1842
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
there's a great articleat https://www.mql5.com/ru/articles/1530
about statistical studies of TC results
I would like to make a similar calculation with NS
what is better to take as a training sample:
1. the results of transactionsP P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P U...
2. or values of statistics from tester (MO, Sharpe's coefficient, maximal series of profits/losses....) on several test periods
?
Good article.
I agree. Wonderfully laid out.
And how would your network look at such an option? The NS looks at the situation narrowly.
Understand one thing.
I am not here to destroy machine learning theory, but to understand and improve upon it to the best of my ability.
In the field of machine learning I have a complete zero and never said that I am proficient in this business. I am learning from you and from you.
The law is sacred. It is complicated in its description, it is not understandable to everyone.
Well first of all I didn't say anything to you about the MO. We talked to you exclusively about the market, and the law to which the price obeys I described above, but you seem too independent in knowledge that at least read it and try to understand. The discussion is over. Good luck!!!!
That's it. I'll shut up. And don't pour boiling water on me.
That's it. I won't say anything. And don't pour boiling water on me.
Understand one thing.
I have not come to destroy the theory of machine learning, but to understand and improve on my capabilities.
It's easier to understand from the history of NS
That's it, sorry. Just reading.
That's it, I'm sorry. Just reading.
You do not think, no one closes your mouth, just gathered here specific guys who can not tolerate demagoguery. Although AI systems have the ability to produce a non-obvious answer, but it's still an exact science where 1+1=2, rather than approximately, allegedly. So also the market is quite a specific type of activity where there are actual news, and there are pseudo teachings. Such as Yusuf's, for example.
Let's turn to Wikipedia, do you trust it?
Market- a set of processes and procedures for the exchange between buyers (consumers) and sellers(suppliers) of certain goods and services.
So maybe information about the relationship between buyers and sellers is important, rather than waves, stochastics, Bollinger, etc.? What do you think? You know, there are a lot of pseudo-experiments that are trying to take the first place.... I think I'll make another video, but this time it's a text. And with the sound, I think we need to come up with something normal. Damn, no one knows why gopro writes sound with noise????