Machine learning in trading: theory, models, practice and algo-trading - page 1572

[Дмитрий]

Maxim Dmitrievsky:
Can I get more quotes from Wikipedia? While I'm sitting on the toilet

О! You know what you can do? You can also come up with a "random walk with a normal distribution function"!

If the Laplace function works, why not...

That would be a bomb.

[Aleksey Mavrin]

Dmitry:

The probability of falling out LLCOOOOOOOOOOOOOO is the same as the probability of falling out OROOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO.

The probability of falling out LLCOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO is the same as the probability of falling out LLCOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO.

s. I'll try to change your mind, or you try to change mine)

[Дмитрий]

Aleksey Mavrin:

Interesting statement. which one can you tell for example for OOOOOOR , OOOOOOOO

I'll try to change your mind, or you try to change mine)

https://www.matburo.ru/tvart_sub.php?p=art_moneta

[[Deleted]]

I'll just leave it here

http://www.turingfinance.com/hacking-the-random-walk-hypothesis/#hacking

[Дмитрий]

Maxim Dmitrievsky:

I'll just leave it here

http://www.turingfinance.com/hacking-the-random-walk-hypothesis/#hacking

The article says that financial market quotes are NOT a random walk and therefore predictable.

And you, before you got sucked in by the push, wrote that quotes are MUCH more difficult than a random walk, so you can predict a walk is like sitting in the push.

[[Deleted]]

Dimitri:

The article says that financial market quotes are NOT a random walk and therefore predictable.

And you, before you got sucked in by the push, wrote that quotes are MUCH more difficult than random straying, so you can predict straying like sitting in a shovel.

The article also says that gsci are pseudo-random

my picture shows that the quotes are more random than my gsc. that's what I wrote about.

[Дмитрий]

Maxim Dmitrievsky:

The article also states that the GCs are pseudo-random

my picture shows that the quotes are more random than my gsc. that's exactly what I wrote about.

1. There is no such thing as a LUT. There are PRNGs.

2. In your picture SB may have a Laplace distribution function - this is NOT SB, in fact

[[Deleted]]

Maxim Dmitrievsky:

The article also states that the rcs are pseudo-random

my picture shows that the quotes are more random than my gcj. that's exactly what I wrote about.

I wonder what you have done to piss everyone off? SB supporters are distinguished by their aplomb, based on nothing, in all threads.

[Aleksey Nikolayev]

Maxim Dmitrievsky:

I'll just leave it here

http://www.turingfinance.com/hacking-the-random-walk-hypothesis/#hacking

The article is not bad. The main problem with this approach is that a small p-value for some abstract statistic does not mean it is small for profit. Actually my article about gaps is about this.

[Aleksey Mavrin]

Dmitriy:

https://www.matburo.ru/tvart_sub.php?p=art_moneta

Charite) Then such a question - is there a plus strategy in games:

1. with a coin. the bet is constant

2. with an opponent. the choice of the coin bet is alternating. the bet is constant.

3,4 Same as 1,2 but the bet in each move can grow by an arbitrary amount, not less than the original.