Machine learning in trading: theory, models, practice and algo-trading - page 3403
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
What are the errors? The result is identical in the case of "without balancing".
I will try to teach with the version after balancing.
The errors were in the codes I highlighted.
I think that' s what you're talking about. There was nothing there at all - maybe the syntax has changed for a couple of years? And so - of course you should always check the code if you can.
You must mean this. There was nothing there at all - maybe the syntax has changed for a couple of years? But of course you should always check the code if you have a chance.
This is a link to my code from yesterday.
I mean this misunderstanding.
this is a link to MY code from yesterday.
I was referring to this misunderstanding
It works correctly.
It works correctly.
no
I'll give it a try, only indexes are needed to exclude columns.....
no
How "no" - if the result is correct?
How is "no" - if the result is correct?
I had the wrong one.
Here's an example.
As I realise there is a lot of randomness in the balancing, I got this result.
I had the wrong one
Well, judging by your code you have different expectations - not what I need :)