You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
One more crucial difference between forex and stocks is the leverage applied. While stock traders mostly trade withour leverage, forex traders in average use 50 or more, which is 50 times riskier. First thing to do is to check what forex traders that trade without leverage are doing
Leverage is actually a double-edged sword. Without it there would'nt be retail traders today, on the other hand, it make the losing process to be much quicker.
We cannot solve our problems with the same thinking we used when we created them.
A. Einstein
We cannot solve our problems with the same thinking we used when we created them.
A. Einstein
Yes!
Facts about creativity and innovation, it doesn't usually happen unless you change the way you've been working.
also doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results is a definition of insanity
A. Einstein
Leverage is actually a double-edged sword. Without it there would'nt be retail traders today, on the other hand, it make the losing process to be much quicker.
And most of them use it to perform suicide. I welcome the attitude of thinking it over from start, always. But, there's an easy explanation to the fact of most traders lose, that is logic and easy to understand, which makes it a prefarable one and one that needs to tackle first IMHO.
Hopefully, my post can help someone reading this thread.
Many popular trading strategies developed last 100 years started to study US stock market.
For example, Dow Theory (1900s), Elliott Wave Theory (1930s), Volume Spread Analysis (1930s), Harmonic Pattern (1930s), Value investing (1940s), Triangle and Wedge Patterns (1930s), support and resistance (can't trace back), fibonacci ratio analysis (can't trace back) and so on.
Then all these trading strategies developed in us stock market equally work well in Forex market too.
Hence, those strategy or technical analysis had the second test in forex market but they stood up.
Commodity or future traders also use technical analysis developed from stock market.
Probability is just one sub topic in science and math. It is not necessarily the other way around.
Especially, probabilty or statistic is the math trying to derive something from the historical data.
Once again, using historical data will do something but it is not necessarily better or only approach to test or to study the market.
In trading, we always need to get in touch with the latest information source.
Hence, one needs to be careful when they analyze the trading business through EA.
Kind regards.
Thank you Dominik.
First approach I'm busy working on right now is simple actually, first I worked out a definition of UP/Down movement, then workout probabilities then finally risk management approach.
I found a way to define an algorithm for up / down movement, worked out a very promising probability of 54%. I wont go into details its a complex subject but for reference, I got a lot of inspiration from this article .
I will publish the project as a free EA after 30 days live trading test which I hope will be after December 3rd, for further inputs from others willing to approach this differently.
Do you really think that a professional trader who has developed a trading strategy that actually works in forex (the most difficult market to trade, as you all stated by yourself) would sell it for 100 bucks etc. on platforms like mql5.com?
I agree: If you don't have the time/endurance to "educate" yourself in trading forex "24/7" for several years and if you aren't a "nerd" - forget it, you'll only waste your ressources. But basically it is possible to become one out of 100'000 forex traders who beats the market not only randomly for a while but in the long run...
Keep this discussion to general issues please, no advertising is allowed in this forum.
Winners know when to stop. everyone has a different reason for wanting to trade. most are deluded but staying and studying the market will teach you about life and physics but putting money in will give you experience. entropy suggests nothing in these 4 dimensions will escape . I can look at the EURUSD chart and tell you what each stage and date taught me about life . How the USA devalued the dollar by 3trillion and we saw the spike of the wave in march 2020 on EURUSD and others.. so because we have choice there are now 5 dimensions to navigate . history has 4 dimensions the future is 5 .. the choices you made and the ones you could have . We have to learn to juggle so that our history reflects our goals .. i have an EA you can message me about as the name was deleted from the post. all the maths is worked out so you can test history based on physics .. volume , direction, spread/commission , time .. 4 dimensions .. Reasearch will show you there are patterns , however low risk patterns dont make much profit and you have to watch them like paint drying .. high risk patters change all the time .. The literature you first find is misleading as you have questioned so thats the answer inho . However people are intelligent and there is power in knowledge .. I cant study and chase down a buck in the wild anymore , making a bow and arrow and disguising myself. Now i must chase a wild currency and eat from it .
Hopefully, my post can help someone reading this thread.
Many popular trading strategies developed last 100 years started to study US stock market.
For example, Dow Theory (1900s), Elliott Wave Theory (1930s), Volume Spread Analysis (1930s), Harmonic Pattern (1930s), Value investing (1940s), Triangle and Wedge Patterns (1930s), support and resistance (can't trace back), fibonacci ratio analysis (can't trace back) and so on.
Then all these trading strategies developed in us stock market equally work well in Forex market too.
Hence, those strategy or technical analysis had the second test in forex market but they stood up.
Commodity or future traders also use technical analysis developed from stock market.
Probability is just one sub topic in science and math. It is not necessarily the other way around.
Especially, probabilty or statistic is the math trying to derive something from the historical data.
Once again, using historical data will do something but it is not necessarily better or only approach to test or to study the market.
In trading, we always need to get in touch with the latest information source.
Hence, one needs to be careful when they analyze the trading business through EA.
Kind regards.