Discussion of article "On Methods to Detect Overbought/Oversold Zones. Part I" - page 2
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
In my opinion, indicators work not from their mathematical formulas, but from their popularity.
From my experience RSI is one of the best indicators, but in a different graphical representation - there is a lot of useful information there.
Any indicator carries a lot of useful information. But the whole question is about accuracy.
Of course, this indicator can be used, but it is better not as a signal indicator, but as a general filter. Why - there is an answer in the article.
It is not for you to judge my intellectual level. For example, my previous article has more than 60 thousand readers in several languages, and according to the English-speaking audience it is among the top ten.
You can shove your ambitions up your arsehole.
if you publish publicly, any reader can judge about you and your article exactly what he/she thinks to write.
Your answers can both clarify unclear points and show your level of competence and adequacy, alas, no more and no less - you are public, but not to "broadcast", but to communicate with your readers.
to summarise: the article is rubbish, the usual 10-year old rubbish pulled by ears for newcomers to the market.
SZY: show me the monitoring state, competence discusser.... ???
you can shove your ambitions up your hole.
If you publish publicly, any reader can judge you and your article by exactly what they think you should write.
Your answers can both clarify unclear points and show your level of competence and adequacy, alas, no more and no less - you are public, but not to "broadcast", but to communicate with your readers.
on the subject: the article is rubbish, the usual 10-year old rubbish pulled by ears for newcomers to the market.
SZY: show me the monitoring stats, competence discusser.... ???
You have stooped to direct insults! This shows your level of culture!
And also - about 10 years old information - lies!
For example, the management of the company, which is a world leader in the development of trading platforms, found my article interesting to publish.
Their opinion is much more important to me than yours.
You are talking about publicity. So publish your article and we will see what you can do. It doesn't take much intelligence to vilify others unapologetically.
It's called trolling!
The article is boring and the comments are a shambles.....
You said that about yourself!
What is it, what swamp has the unclean come from?
Sits such a smart guy, he himself has done nothing worthwhile, but he shits on others!
Write an article, show your level of excellence, rather than spewing obscene words!
If you take criticism so keenly, it will be hard to develop.
Listen to the feedback. They are not about you, but about the article. And you need to improve yourself constantly.
If you take criticism so keenly, it will be hard to develop.
Listen to the feedback. They are not about you, but about the article. And you need to improve yourself constantly.
Andrei, I am only in favour of normal criticism, if it is professional and to the point.
But when abnormal, offensive language is used, it causes a reaction (like any normal person).
For some reason the environment where there should be creativity and respect has turned into a back alley where anyone can be sent ... and humiliated.
And why? And because these people are sure of their impunity (there is no reaction to rudeness from moderators), and this is wrong.
Here you are a professional and do not allow such things. And why? Because you are a professional.
Criticism is criticism. If we talk about overbought oversold and try to make the article as informative as possible, we lack OBJECTIVES. In my opinion, they better reflect this factor. And there are some indices in the standard set (for example, Money Flow Index). Also BB is taken, but where is AMKA with a set of deviations? Which, by the way, better takes into account the state of the market trend in contrast to BB. And everything in this spirit. In short, it was necessary to go deeper into the topic. And so in general for beginners it's quite good. And don't pay attention to rudeness. My first article without explaining why the moderator even wrapped up. He recommended sending it to the blog. So I thought I would never write another line. And after I saw that (it was a pity it was labour so in the blog still shoved) it reprinted several other sites again sat down for a pen. Good luck and inspiration.
Alexander, thank you for your correctness and objectivity!
I will definitely take your recommendations into account in the 2nd part of the article (in preparation).
And in this article I already gave an announcement of what's coming next:
"In the second part of the article "On methods of searching for overbought/oversold zones" I plan to consider the following questions:
▪ The pros and cons of using traditional methods of finding overbought/oversold zones when using the following analysis tools:
▪ Issues of increasing the efficiency of these analytical tools".
I looked at the article - what a primitive article, I just felt sorry for the time spent on reading it. This is some kind of opus for "a wide range of housewives and taxi drivers".
Such should be published on Yandex.Zen, on this forum - it has no place, here people are more savvy.
On your announcement of the 2nd part - also all this is already outdated. As it was explained to you - investigate price jumps in conintegration with changes in transaction volumes.
My wish is to apply multicollinear analysis to detect peaks in each case for a set of correlated assets (e.g. oil + currencies USDCAD + USDRUB or Gold + stock markets). And don't forget about sampling - as it was explained to you, your reasoning is not interesting, you need adequate statistical sampling, with presample and bootstrapping. Anything that is not objective, not based on statistics and does not show a profit - no one here does not need and is not interested.
So Alexander, please show respect to the community and invest in the 2nd part to the fullest, making it interesting and unique in content.
P.S. And please do not write in my address as others that I have "no articles" and therefore I can not criticise you - as it has already been explained to you, you are deeply self-deluding, assuming that the popularity of your previous article here is interesting to someone, and that the presence of articles in general is somehow valued. People on this forum are mostly stubborn coders, busy searching for profitable strategies and patterns, so I will repeat once again - take the 2nd article a level higher and remember that everything that is not objective, not based on statistics and does not show a profit - no one needs and is not interested.