
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
I actually using hedging strategy for more than 11 month and it works for me.
Don't hedging if you're not clearly understand how the characteristics of the pair you trade.
It works for me, but maybe it doesn't suit for you.
Yopie, show us [with mathematics] that hedging yields a better result than just 'going flat' or partial closes.
Like this:
[Hedge]
enter long at 1.0000 (net 1 lot long)
price rise to 1.1000 (1000 pips gain)
hedge at 1.1000 with 1 lot short (net flat)
price falls to 1.0500 (no loss: 500 pip gain from the short, 500 pip loss from the long)
remove hedge at 1.0500 (net 1 lot long)
price rise to 1.1000 (500 pips gain)
close for 1500 pips profit
[No Hedge]
enter long at 1.000 (1 lot long)
close at 1.1000 (1000 pips gain)
re enter long at 1.0500 (1 lot long)
close at 1.1000 (500 pips gain)
total profit 1500 pips.
Its almost like hedging does not improve the strategy....
Sorry it's just my opinion & my experience,
you know how to proove that i'm not lying.
And dont ask me about mathematics because I'm not expert on it :)
Good luck
...
What is all of that ranting ?
The discussion is absolutely not about opening trades in different directions with a separated logic (hedging account, multiple strategies). The discussion is about what people call "hedging", which means opening a trade in the opposite direction of a losing trade, rather than closing the losing trade.
It's easy to be right when you talk alone. Answer the questions if you want to be serious.
You wouldn't expect Metaquotes to announce
which expands the possibilities of gullible retail Forex traders to pay additional costs to the broker"
would you?
Metaquotes' customers are the brokers and I am sure that they welcomed this additional income stream.
Ok, try one more time.
You have a buy trade open and it is losing $10.
You open a sell trade with the same lot size so you now have a "hedged" position.
Now, explain how it is possible that at any time, while you have these 2 trades open, that the net loss reduces.
What is all of that ranting ?
The discussion is absolutely not about opening trades in different directions with a separated logic (hedging account, multiple strategies). The discussion is about what people call "hedging", which means opening a trade in the opposite direction of a losing trade, rather than closing the losing trade.
It's easy to be right when you talk alone. Answer the questions if you want to be serious.
All my posts in this forum thread are strictly related to the topic starter
Let's take a close look at the start message
"i need a hedge tool or ea
it will minimize any lose position has been opened by another EA ,
i dont want to use sl , i need to hedge it"
Firstly "any lose"
=> any negative move of the profit even in positive zone
Secondly "position has been opened by another EA"
=> that is absolutely "with a separated logic"!
Thirdly "i dont want to use sl , i need to hedge it"
=> it is "absolutely not about opening trades in different directions"
Yopie, show us [with mathematics] that hedging yields a better result than just 'going flat' or partial closes.
Like this:
[Hedge]
enter long at 1.0000 (net 1 lot long)
price rise to 1.1000 (1000 pips gain)
hedge at 1.1000 with 1 lot short (net flat)
price falls to 1.0500 (no loss: 500 pip gain from the short, 500 pip loss from the long)
remove hedge at 1.0500 (net 1 lot long)
price rise to 1.1000 (500 pips gain)
close for 1500 pips profit
[No Hedge]
enter long at 1.000 (1 lot long)
close at 1.1000 (1000 pips gain)
re enter long at 1.0500 (1 lot long)
close at 1.1000 (500 pips gain)
total profit 1500 pips.
Its almost like hedging does not improve the strategy...
you totally destroy the logic , read about recovery zone strategy , or hedge trading , how to use hedge . then you will understand
You wouldn't expect Metaquotes to announce
which expands the possibilities of gullible retail Forex traders to pay additional costs to the broker"
would you?
Metaquotes' customers are the brokers and I am sure that they welcomed this additional income stream.
Ok, try one more time.
You have a buy trade open and it is losing $10.
You open a sell trade with the same lot size so you now have a "hedged" position.
Now, explain how it is possible that at any time, while you have these 2 trades open, that the net loss reduces.
Ok, try one more time
"You have ...
You open ...
Now, ..."
This situation is very divorced from the real trading context
The real trading context =>
=> floating spread
=> uncertainty with order volume filling
=> very variable times of order execution
=> and so on almost to infinity ...
And =>
=> reasons for opening the initial position
=> current state of these causes
=> reasons for opening the opposite position
=> other ready-to-use position management procedures
=> and so on almost to infinity ...
Summary
1> In real trading simple math doesn't work
because it is the area of high uncertainty
2> The reasons for closing the initial position
should be as specific as the reasons for opening it
Again an interesting conversation about hedging.
It's actually always the same:
Some people, that think they can grab something out of the markets, without doing much for it [opening trades without any technical logic, but by mathematical assumptions]
and others that say, that all mathematical calculations speak against it.
I personally think, that hedging is dangerous, as you never know where this trade-basket is going to end...
Like grid/martingale...
But who knows?
Maybe hedging works, if you are lucky.
Ok, try one more time.
You have a buy trade open and it is losing $10.
You open a sell trade with the same lot size so you now have a "hedged" position.
Now, explain how it is possible that at any time, while you have these 2 trades open, that the net loss reduces.
"You have ...
You open ...
Now, ..."
This situation is very divorced from the real trading context
Waffle waffle blah blah blah.
Just admit it. You can't give a simple answer to the simple question can you?
I knew that already. That is because it is not possible to reduce the loss on a trade by "hedging".