I used to get a lot of that.
Sometimes I'd code using a tried and "proven" strategy and after I'd finished, they'd come back to me and ask me to add additional filters. Why would they need that? The strategy was "proven", right?
I think that the best answer is to tell them to trade with their brilliant strategy until they make enough money to be able to pay someone to code an EA. After all, it won't take them long to build up enough profits, will it?
No free help
urgent help.
Or pay someone. Top of every page is the link Freelance.
Hiring to write
script - General - MQL5 programming forum
Put the ball back into their court.
By that I mean, if someone insists that their strategy works, ask for hard evidence . . . a CSV of trading history, an
equity curve, etc. Something verifiable. Their inability to deliver evidence will typically end the conversation.
Hey all!
I think that the strategy prevails on the code itself, even if a strategy is non-ideally coded it may be profitable.
I'm sure I'm not the only one here who has tried many like : individually each indicators, hedging, martingale etc ... these are well known and common strategies ... you'll find plenty of on the internet
But what about those kind of strategies called "holygraals" here around ... Well it may be your buddy's one - how would you know but by checking ?
So yes, personnally, if based on my experience I trust in a strategy offered by someone, somewhere then I may accept to give a try depending on my availability
EDIT : Recently I was reading a paper about the creators of Instagram and it's indeed common to see one bringing the concept (Systrom) and another one bringing the code (Krieger)I used to get a lot of that.
Sometimes I'd code using a tried and "proven" strategy and after I'd finished, they'd come back to me and ask me to add additional filters. Why would they need that? The strategy was "proven", right?
I think that the best answer is to tell them to trade with their brilliant strategy until they make enough money to be able to pay someone to code an EA. After all, it won't take them long to build up enough profits, will it?
Put the ball back into their court.
By that I mean, if someone insists that their strategy works, ask for hard evidence . . . a CSV of trading history, an
equity curve, etc. Something verifiable. Their inability to deliver evidence will typically end the conversation.
Just stay away from such people. There is not even a need to answer and to lost time discussing. This will never become a good customer for a serious job.
I think that the strategy prevails on the code itself, even if a strategy is non-ideally coded it may be profitable.
I'm sure I'm not the only one here who has tried many like : individually each indicators, hedging, martingale etc ... these are well known and common strategies ... you'll find plenty of on the internet
But what about those kind of strategies called "holygraals" here around ... Well it may be your buddy's one - how would you know but by checking ?
So yes, personnally, if based on my experience I trust in a strategy offered by someone, somewhere then I may accept to give a try depending on my availability
EDIT : Recently I was reading a paper about the creators of Instagram and it's indeed common to see one bringing the concept (Systrom) and another one bringing the code (Krieger)
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
You agree to website policy and terms of use
Hey all!