Scripts: ThirdPartyTicks - page 8

[BillionerClub]

fxsaber:

Unfortunately I can't get the code to update, the KB is swearing.

Dear, thank you! for everything you have done.

Most likely the code was edited after publication.

[fxsaber]

fxsaber:

Unfortunately I can't get the code to update, the KB is swearing.

It worked. Updated it.

[fxsaber]

Please, ask those who use the script on strong processors.

Download (you can do it in a PM) your running speed, if it is higher than this (see the log in the Experts tab).

UnZip RannForex\EURUSD.rann\EURUSD.rann_20200130.csv.zip 377549 bytes - unpack size 2933546 bytes.
Total Ticks (EURUSD.rann) = 51248067 (5064206 ticks/sec.), Reserve = 63143394
UnZip RannForex\EURUSD.rann\EURUSD.rann_20200131.csv.zip 416283 bytes - unpack size 3290661 bytes.
Total Ticks (EURUSD.rann) = 51324594 (5064652 ticks/sec.), Reserve = 63143394
Recording...
Calculating Digits...
Normalizing Ticks...
Correcting Ticks...
Corrected 49944 ticks.
Saving Ticks...
Saved ticks = 51324594 (3465702 ticks/sec)
Generating Rates...
Generated Rates = 716312
Saving Rates...
Saved Rates = 716312 (5544639 rates/sec)
EURUSD.rann_RannForex saved ticks = 51324594
Alert: EURUSD.rann_RannForex - Done.

I am interested in the processor and the highlighted number. The result from the example above is made on this configuration.

Windows 10 (build 18362) x64, IE 11, UAC, Intel Core i7-6700 K  @ 4.00 GHz, Memory: 8625 / 16322 Mb, Disk: 17 / 223 Gb

[Edgar Akhmadeev]

fxsaber:

Interested in the processor and the allocated number. The result from the example above is done on this configuration.

Looked at your configuration, immediately the moment: experts write that for effective and fast work of SSD free space should be at least 25%. Below that, a sharp drop in speed begins.

[fxsaber]

Edgar Akhmadeev:

I looked at your configuration, and I have a moment: experts write that for SSD to work efficiently and fast there should be at least 25% free space. Below that, the speed starts to drop sharply.

In this case, the bottle neck is still the CPU.

[HimOrik]

fxsaber, thank you for your labours.

When compiling this EA https://www.mql5.com/ru/forum/232030/page2#comment_7069847, I get an error.

Error

Text of owl

functions in the Data file

Different number of arguments?

[fxsaber]

HimOrik:

When compiling this EA https://www.mql5.com/ru/forum/232030/page2#comment_7069847, it gives an error.

Add/replace these lines

  MAXPROFIT( const double Commission = 0, const bool inRelative = false ) : FlagUP(true), MinMax(-DBL_MAX), Relative(inRelative),
                                                                            MarkupBid(1 - Commission), MarkupAsk(1 + Commission)
  {
    this.SetReserve(RESERVE);
  }
  
  void AddTick( MqlTick &Tick )
  {
    this.SetMarkup(Tick);
    
    if (this.Relative)
      MAXPROFIT::MathLog(Tick);
    
    if (this.FlagUP)
    {
      if (Tick.bid > this.MinMax)
        this.MinMax = Tick.bid;
      else if (Tick.ask < this.MinMax)
      {
        this.Add(this.MinMax);
        
        this.MinMax = Tick.ask;
        this.FlagUP = false;
      }
    }
    else
    {
      if (Tick.ask < this.MinMax)
        this.MinMax = Tick.ask;
      else if (Tick.bid > this.MinMax)
      {
        this.Add(this.MinMax);

[Sergei Lebedev]

fxsaber:

I noticed delays some time ago related to this, so I specially implemented a workaround of the problem. Since then there have been no delays.

Now I have 18 GB archive and zips > 35 000 pieces. Everything works fast, without delays.

Perhaps you have not fully understood how it works, that's why you put forward such a hypothesis.

Today I was also dealing with this script and I still have the same understanding as traveller00 2 that there is a double check for the presence of an update: suppose that Sync = t rue(i.e. there is a need to do Refresh).

- first we run Refresh() - in the section of all symbols we have determined whether there are updates on the server,

- then run Update(false) - we pump up new zip files for a particular symbol, false prevents a second Refresh,

- then execute ToCustomSymbol(Sync, false, MinPips) - here we rebuild the custom symbol, but if initially Sync = t rue, then Refresh(true) is called again.

Ideally, after calling Refresh() it is more correct to call ToCustomSymbol(false, false, MinPips) .

Can you tell me if this is the correct understanding?

[HimOrik]

fxsaber, thanks for the quick reply.

This is the picture when optimising:

settings

does not count. Am I doing something wrong?

[fxsaber]

HimOrik:

doesn't count. Am I doing something wrong?

In the Tester settings you need to select a custom optimisation criterion.